Tools & Wizards About Us
passengerpigeon.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

passengerpigeon.org

Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

99 ms

passengerpigeon.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to passengerpigeon.org homepage info - get ready to check Passengerpigeon best content right away, or after learning these important things about passengerpigeon.org

Visit passengerpigeon.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Passengerpigeon.org page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

passengerpigeon.org performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

passengerpigeon.org

98 ms

passengerpigeon.org

1303 ms

style.min.css

11 ms

style-main.min.css

22 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Passengerpigeon.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Passengerpigeon.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.6 kB (53%)

Content Size

912.7 kB

After Optimization

430.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Passengerpigeon.org main page is 912.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 676.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 114.9 kB
  • After minification 93.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Passengerpigeon needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 403.4 kB

  • Original 676.7 kB
  • After minification 676.7 kB
  • After compression 273.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 403.4 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 61.9 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 52.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Passengerpigeon.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (83%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Passengerpigeon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

passengerpigeon.org

passengerpigeon.org

98 ms

passengerpigeon.org

passengerpigeon.org

1303 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

11 ms

style-main.min.css

style-main.min.css

22 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

13 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

23 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

14 ms

post-13180.css

post-13180.css

22 ms

post-13159.css

post-13159.css

24 ms

css

css

41 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

23 ms

circle-counter.js

circle-counter.js

23 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

25 ms

form.js

form.js

26 ms

leaflet.js

leaflet.js

27 ms

leaflet-gesture-handling.js

leaflet-gesture-handling.js

25 ms

leaflet-map.js

leaflet-map.js

24 ms

lottie-player.min.js

lottie-player.min.js

27 ms

lottie-interactivity.min.js

lottie-interactivity.min.js

27 ms

lottie.js

lottie.js

29 ms

popup.js

popup.js

27 ms

progress-bar.js

progress-bar.js

29 ms

glide.min.js

glide.min.js

29 ms

slider.js

slider.js

30 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

30 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

31 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

30 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

30 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

32 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

32 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

33 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

32 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

34 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

34 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

71 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

71 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

72 ms

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_JohnEdelman-q2i4i8ay88yf1ryyapwe3h6c20lgceacr15uqfxfds.png

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_JohnEdelman-q2i4i8ay88yf1ryyapwe3h6c20lgceacr15uqfxfds.png

70 ms

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_Wintrust-768x318.png

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_Wintrust-768x318.png

71 ms

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_ComEd-q2i4i3lra2rzfq5s25v990d1338m9wrp2dwfc24e8w.png

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_ComEd-q2i4i3lra2rzfq5s25v990d1338m9wrp2dwfc24e8w.png

64 ms

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_USFS-768x318.png

PNNM_C3_Sponsor_USFS-768x318.png

78 ms

c3

c3

44 ms

font

font

20 ms

font

font

25 ms

Accessibility Review

passengerpigeon.org accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

passengerpigeon.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

passengerpigeon.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Passengerpigeon.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Passengerpigeon.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

passengerpigeon.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Passengerpigeon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: