Tools & Wizards About Us
passmark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

passmark.com

PassMark Software - PC Benchmark and Test Software

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

590 ms

passmark.com screenshot

About Website

Visit passmark.com now to see the best up-to-date Pass Mark content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about passmark.com

Benchmark & PC test software. Computer forensics and loopback test plugs for burn in testing

Visit passmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Passmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

passmark.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.266

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

passmark.com

122 ms

www.passmark.com

238 ms

bootstrap.min.css

98 ms

slick.css

145 ms

slick-theme.css

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Passmark.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (385 ms) belongs to the original domain Passmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.8 kB (15%)

Content Size

965.4 kB

After Optimization

819.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Passmark.com main page is 965.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 710.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 89.9 kB

  • Original 97.3 kB
  • After minification 50.7 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46.6 kB, which is 48% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.9 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 710.1 kB
  • After minification 690.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pass Mark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 110.9 kB
  • After minification 110.9 kB
  • After compression 78.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 47.1 kB
  • After compression 43.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Passmark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (34%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pass Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

passmark.com

passmark.com

122 ms

www.passmark.com

www.passmark.com

238 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

98 ms

slick.css

slick.css

145 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

146 ms

style.css

style.css

160 ms

jquery3.3.1.js

jquery3.3.1.js

213 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

212 ms

script.js

script.js

168 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

193 ms

js

js

54 ms

34 ms

PassMarkLogo.png

PassMarkLogo.png

70 ms

icon_search.png

icon_search.png

73 ms

icon_phone.png

icon_phone.png

70 ms

icon_cart.png

icon_cart.png

70 ms

passmark_banner.svg

passmark_banner.svg

73 ms

tweet.png

tweet.png

73 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

153 ms

bg_home_2.jpg

bg_home_2.jpg

157 ms

download.png

download.png

152 ms

shop.png

shop.png

154 ms

bg_home_2_1.jpg

bg_home_2_1.jpg

154 ms

bg_home_3.jpg

bg_home_3.jpg

288 ms

bg_home_3_1.png

bg_home_3_1.png

155 ms

bg_home_4.jpg

bg_home_4.jpg

291 ms

bg_home_4_1.jpg

bg_home_4_1.jpg

289 ms

perf_test_3_monitors.png

perf_test_3_monitors.png

292 ms

bg_usb_3_0.jpg

bg_usb_3_0.jpg

290 ms

loopback_plugs.png

loopback_plugs.png

290 ms

burn_big_icon.png

burn_big_icon.png

291 ms

perform_big_icon.png

perform_big_icon.png

292 ms

memtest_big_icon.png

memtest_big_icon.png

292 ms

bit_bg_2.jpg

bit_bg_2.jpg

293 ms

usb3_icon_big.png

usb3_icon_big.png

343 ms

power_texter_big_icon.jpg

power_texter_big_icon.jpg

294 ms

pci_big_icon.jpg

pci_big_icon.jpg

295 ms

bg_blue_pixel.png

bg_blue_pixel.png

295 ms

osforensis_big_icon.jpg

osforensis_big_icon.jpg

295 ms

osfmount.jpg

osfmount.jpg

341 ms

imageusb-tile.png

imageusb-tile.png

353 ms

ind_bencmark_big_icon.jpg

ind_bencmark_big_icon.jpg

343 ms

soft_cust_big_icon.jpg

soft_cust_big_icon.jpg

344 ms

market_big_icon.jpg

market_big_icon.jpg

344 ms

icon-right.png

icon-right.png

352 ms

logo_pay_ae.png

logo_pay_ae.png

351 ms

logo_pay_alipay_small.png

logo_pay_alipay_small.png

358 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

352 ms

logo_pay_wechat.png

logo_pay_wechat.png

384 ms

logo_pay_jcb.png

logo_pay_jcb.png

385 ms

logo_pay_maestro_1.png

logo_pay_maestro_1.png

384 ms

logo_pay_maestro_2.png

logo_pay_maestro_2.png

384 ms

logo_pay_pp.png

logo_pay_pp.png

339 ms

ProximaNova-Bold.woff

ProximaNova-Bold.woff

340 ms

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

304 ms

logo_pay_visa.png

logo_pay_visa.png

374 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

240 ms

slide_left.png

slide_left.png

241 ms

slide_right.png

slide_right.png

242 ms

js

js

45 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

41 ms

js

js

132 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

188 ms

collect

collect

109 ms

Accessibility Review

passmark.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

passmark.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

passmark.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Passmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Passmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

passmark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pass Mark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: