655 ms in total
27 ms
354 ms
274 ms
Click here to check amazing Patchstack content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about patchstack.com
Detect vulnerabilities for free with the fastest vulnerability mitigation for WordPress. Protect sites with vPatching. Start for free!
Visit patchstack.comWe analyzed Patchstack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 628 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
patchstack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value1,370 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
27 ms
26 ms
10 ms
25 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Patchstack.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (132 ms) belongs to the original domain Patchstack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 177.5 kB (33%)
542.1 kB
364.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Patchstack.com main page is 542.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 211.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Patchstack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Patchstack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)
61
32
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Patchstack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
patchstack.com
27 ms
patchstack.com
26 ms
blocks.style.build.css
10 ms
ecf.css
25 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
style.css
23 ms
aos.css
22 ms
oxygen.css
65 ms
style.css
24 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
15094.css
60 ms
16992.css
23 ms
14104.css
25 ms
7201.css
30 ms
12988.css
63 ms
universal.css
40 ms
highlight.min.js
29 ms
core@2
41 ms
tippy.js@6
53 ms
gsap.min.js
39 ms
ScrollTrigger.min.js
39 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
52 ms
app.build.js
42 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
29 ms
hooks.min.js
43 ms
i18n.min.js
42 ms
web-components.esm.js
44 ms
lottie-player.min.js
49 ms
lottie-interactivity.js
47 ms
intersectionobserver.js
46 ms
lottie-init.js
49 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
51 ms
flickity-init-4.js
51 ms
core@2.11.8
93 ms
tippy.js@6.3.7
80 ms
logo.svg
27 ms
patchstack_protection_fp-1.webp
12 ms
patchstack_dashboard_fp-1.webp
12 ms
software-gallery-1-opt.webp
30 ms
patchstack_reports-1-opt.webp
13 ms
dashboard-gallery-mobile-1.webp
13 ms
confetti.webp
126 ms
visualcomposer_256x2-opt.webp
17 ms
elementor_256x256.svg
118 ms
wprocket_256x256-opt.webp
17 ms
wpbakery_256x256-opt.webp
23 ms
mainwp_256x256.png
28 ms
clicky_256x256.svg
118 ms
protection@2x-2-300x-opt.webp
118 ms
alert-700x700-1-2-30-opt.webp
121 ms
automate@2x-2-300x30-1.webp
121 ms
map3-1.png
124 ms
group-one.svg
126 ms
liza.webp
120 ms
yes.svg
127 ms
fp-reviews-g2.svg
121 ms
Icon-StarFull.svg
123 ms
sitecare-new-webp-2-opt.webp
130 ms
plesk-new-webp-2-opt.webp
128 ms
optilogo326-1-webp-2-opt.webp
125 ms
xxl-new-webp-2-opt.webp
132 ms
link-arrow.svg
127 ms
logo-opt-300x32.webp
129 ms
EIC-logo-CoFundedBy-opt.webp
128 ms
logo.png
130 ms
tippy-bundle.umd.min.js
23 ms
popper.min.js
24 ms
Faktum-Regular.woff
26 ms
Faktum-SemiBold.woff
24 ms
Faktum-Bold.woff
39 ms
Faktum-WideSemiBold.woff
24 ms
Faktum-WideMedium.woff
23 ms
Faktum-WideRegular.woff
38 ms
patchstack.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
patchstack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
patchstack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Patchstack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Patchstack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
patchstack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Patchstack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: