9.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
7.4 sec
130 ms
Click here to check amazing Patricia Rademaker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about patriciarademaker.com
Visit patriciarademaker.comWe analyzed Patriciarademaker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
patriciarademaker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.264
46/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
1556 ms
679 ms
540 ms
877 ms
590 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Patriciarademaker.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Patriciarademaker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 51.6 kB (8%)
620.5 kB
568.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Patriciarademaker.com main page is 620.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 476.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Patricia Rademaker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 446 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Patriciarademaker.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (76%)
25
6
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Patricia Rademaker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.patriciarademaker.com
1556 ms
style.min.css
679 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
540 ms
woocommerce.css
877 ms
style.min.css
590 ms
style.css
598 ms
css
21 ms
font-awesome.min.css
606 ms
jquery.min.js
1048 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
887 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
900 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
936 ms
js.cookie.min.js
910 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1176 ms
wc-blocks.css
1186 ms
script.min.js
1171 ms
fitvids.js
1143 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1239 ms
global.js
1328 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
1373 ms
order-attribution.min.js
1430 ms
outback-features.jpg
1288 ms
seascapes-features.jpg
1305 ms
nature-features.jpg
1638 ms
Patricia_cpd_3386.jpg
1065 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAM.woff
8 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7Owc.woff
14 ms
tDbX2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4lLz5CwOnTg.woff
16 ms
tDbK2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4nAfcGA.woff
17 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
1160 ms
patriciarademaker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
patriciarademaker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
patriciarademaker.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Patriciarademaker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Patriciarademaker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
patriciarademaker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Patricia Rademaker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: