Tools & Wizards About Us
payday-choice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

payday-choice.com

家を建てるときの心得について｜知っておきたい家づくり情報

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

326 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

211 ms

payday-choice.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to payday-choice.com homepage info - get ready to check Payday Choice best content right away, or after learning these important things about payday-choice.com

夢のマイホームを持つというのは、とても素晴らしいことです。

Visit payday-choice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Payday-choice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 326 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

payday-choice.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

payday-choice.com

326 ms

www.payday-choice.com

1137 ms

jscss.php

266 ms

mootools-core.js

672 ms

core.js

335 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Payday-choice.com, 18% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.clicktale.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Payday-choice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 182.7 kB (63%)

Content Size

290.5 kB

After Optimization

107.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Payday-choice.com main page is 290.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 285.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 62% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 179.4 kB

  • Original 285.2 kB
  • After minification 282.8 kB
  • After compression 105.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (77%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Payday Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

payday-choice.com

payday-choice.com

326 ms

www.payday-choice.com

www.payday-choice.com

1137 ms

jscss.php

jscss.php

266 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

672 ms

core.js

core.js

335 ms

caption.js

caption.js

336 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

804 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

568 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

468 ms

extrascript_v2.js

extrascript_v2.js

466 ms

ga.js

ga.js

63 ms

e8f42122-591a-40ce-b592-523efbbc00ea.js

e8f42122-591a-40ce-b592-523efbbc00ea.js

216 ms

HelveticaNeueLTPro-Th.otf

HelveticaNeueLTPro-Th.otf

456 ms

inpage_linkid.js

inpage_linkid.js

13 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

34 ms

collect

collect

235 ms

WRf4.js

WRf4.js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

payday-choice.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

payday-choice.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

payday-choice.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Payday-choice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Payday-choice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

payday-choice.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Payday Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: