4.9 sec in total
505 ms
3.1 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to payment.page homepage info - get ready to check Payment best content right away, or after learning these important things about payment.page
Looking for a WordPress payment plugin to create beautiful payment forms? Try Payment Page with multi-gateway support and rich customization options.
Visit payment.pageWe analyzed Payment.page page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
payment.page performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
505 ms
604 ms
581 ms
102 ms
3 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Payment.page, 2% (1 request) were made to and 2% (1 request) were made to Api.producthunt.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Payment.page.
Page size can be reduced by 782.1 kB (25%)
3.1 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Payment.page main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 609.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 609.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Payment images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
34
34
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Payment. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
payment.page
505 ms
lazyload.min.js
604 ms
Shape.svg
581 ms
Call-to-Action-Shapes.svg
102 ms
wARDj0u
3 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
478 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
478 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
61 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
580 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
512 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
557 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
579 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
629 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
696 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
922 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
863 ms
eicons.woff
1331 ms
featured.svg
145 ms
PP_logo.png
262 ms
payment-form.jpg
441 ms
wpm-logo.svg
439 ms
wp-logo.svg
826 ms
wpmail-1.png
827 ms
wpweekly-logo.svg
827 ms
ubc-logo.png
829 ms
chill-hype.png
830 ms
peter-bartesch.jpg
830 ms
Installation-Payment-Page.jpg
958 ms
Set-Up-Payment-Page.jpg
1011 ms
Customize-Payment-Page.webp
1004 ms
Publish-Payment-Page.webp
830 ms
Kristifor-Pirkovikj-Profile-Testimonial.jpg
965 ms
yoshua-reece-testimonial-profile.jpg
1092 ms
Payment-Page-Template-Previews@2x.png
1345 ms
Payments-Cloud.svg
1232 ms
Rich-Payment-Form.svg
976 ms
Freelance-Preview-Placeholder.jpg
1394 ms
Consultants-Preview.jpg
1409 ms
Agency-Preview.jpg
1544 ms
Non-Profit-Preview.jpg
1598 ms
Sass-Preview.jpg
1675 ms
Freelance-Marketplace.jpg
1744 ms
Simple-Payment-Form-Image.jpg
1819 ms
Brand-Payment-Form-Image-Preview.jpg
1904 ms
Richard.png
1890 ms
Call-to-Action-Forms-WEBP.webp
1852 ms
stripe_partner_badge_verified_white.png
1886 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
1892 ms
payment.page accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
payment.page best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
payment.page SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Payment.page can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Payment.page main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
payment.page
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Payment. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: