8 sec in total
444 ms
7.3 sec
276 ms
Welcome to penofol.com homepage info - get ready to check Penofol best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about penofol.com
Пенофол. Уеплитель. Утепление стен, утепление полов, утепление крыши. Гидроизоляция, пароизоляция, звукоизоляция, подложка
Visit penofol.comWe analyzed Penofol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 444 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
penofol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value29.1 s
0/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
444 ms
1477 ms
583 ms
586 ms
874 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Penofol.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Penofol.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (27%)
3.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Penofol.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Penofol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 274.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 274.5 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 503.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Penofol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 503.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (55%)
69
31
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Penofol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
penofol.com
444 ms
www.penofol.com
1477 ms
default.css
583 ms
mixin_defaults.css
586 ms
swiper.min.js
874 ms
swiper.min.js
463 ms
jquery.min.js
739 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1014 ms
menu.min.js
617 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1094 ms
nc_modal_func.js
1086 ms
popper.min.js
770 ms
index.js
1228 ms
util.js
929 ms
dropdown.js
1460 ms
dropdown.min.js
1079 ms
all.min.js
1509 ms
tether.min.js
1230 ms
drop.min.js
1378 ms
nc_event_dispatch.min.js
1240 ms
font-roboto.css
1377 ms
font-ptsansnarrow.css
1379 ms
font-notosans.css
1394 ms
font-notoserif.css
1525 ms
font-opensans.css
1875 ms
swiper.min.css
1529 ms
fontawesome-all.css
1774 ms
icon-works-webfont.css
1973 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
1659 ms
menu.min.css
1674 ms
autocomplete.min.css
1689 ms
outlined-icons.css
1838 ms
dropdown.css
1824 ms
themify-icons.css
1839 ms
tether.min.css
2227 ms
drop-theme-basic.min.css
1971 ms
style.css
2056 ms
js
62 ms
components.css
1994 ms
mixins.css
1994 ms
nc_stats_analytics_event.min.js
1544 ms
logo_2.png
932 ms
penofol_a_icon.png
500 ms
penofol_b_icon.png
499 ms
penofol_c_Icon.png
587 ms
penofol_euroblock_Icon.png
521 ms
armofol_icon.png
1243 ms
LAMS.png
1226 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.png
932 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.webp
1102 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.jpg
880 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.jpg
1663 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.jpg
1517 ms
osteregaytes_poddelok_150.jpg
1519 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.png
2293 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.jpg
2095 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.png
2429 ms
e2d011643d668be5d35eb20c3300b1a3.jpg
2020 ms
120cf769f940c713e4f3114b4b208474.jpg
2017 ms
120cf769f940c713e4f3114b4b208474.jpg
2386 ms
120cf769f940c713e4f3114b4b208474.jpg
2307 ms
120cf769f940c713e4f3114b4b208474.jpg
2312 ms
120cf769f940c713e4f3114b4b208474.png
2963 ms
120cf769f940c713e4f3114b4b208474.png
3308 ms
tag.js
939 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxM.woff
56 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc-.woff
84 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc-.woff
227 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxMIzQ.woff
227 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-.woff
191 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc-.woff
227 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
2870 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
3164 ms
outlined-iconset.woff
2892 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xMIzQ.woff
207 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc-CsI.woff
215 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc-CsI.woff
184 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzQdKQ.woff
233 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic-CsI.woff
185 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc-CsI.woff
289 ms
advert.gif
701 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
149 ms
1
145 ms
penofol.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
penofol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
penofol.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Penofol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Penofol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
penofol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Penofol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: