Tools & Wizards About Us
penonpaper.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

penonpaper.in

Pen On Paper Design Agency

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

846 ms

penonpaper.in screenshot

About Website

Visit penonpaper.in now to see the best up-to-date Pen On Paper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about penonpaper.in

Visit penonpaper.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Penonpaper.in page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

penonpaper.in performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

penonpaper.in

183 ms

penonpaper.in

324 ms

bootstrap.min.css

126 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

185 ms

index.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Penonpaper.in, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (746 ms) belongs to the original domain Penonpaper.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 420.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Penonpaper.in main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.2 kB

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 352.4 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pen On Paper needs image optimization as it can save up to 352.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 86.9 kB
  • After minification 86.9 kB
  • After compression 65.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 49.3 kB
  • After minification 49.3 kB
  • After compression 30.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Penonpaper.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (13%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

41

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pen On Paper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

penonpaper.in

penonpaper.in

183 ms

penonpaper.in

penonpaper.in

324 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

126 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

185 ms

index.css

index.css

195 ms

css2

css2

27 ms

icon-close.svg

icon-close.svg

191 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

189 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

197 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

282 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

306 ms

index.js

index.js

280 ms

hungama.png

hungama.png

377 ms

rocked.png

rocked.png

493 ms

sif.png

sif.png

436 ms

oluko.png

oluko.png

609 ms

safqat.png

safqat.png

496 ms

fintech.png

fintech.png

543 ms

hungamaGames-client.jpg

hungamaGames-client.jpg

447 ms

singtel-client.jpg

singtel-client.jpg

510 ms

gamma-client.jpg

gamma-client.jpg

513 ms

india-fintech1.png

india-fintech1.png

558 ms

johnsonJohnson-client.jpg

johnsonJohnson-client.jpg

559 ms

rocked-client.jpg

rocked-client.jpg

575 ms

simpli-client.jpg

simpli-client.jpg

576 ms

truefan-client.jpg

truefan-client.jpg

606 ms

wowsly-client.jpg

wowsly-client.jpg

621 ms

b4u-client.jpg

b4u-client.jpg

627 ms

testimonial-icon.png

testimonial-icon.png

638 ms

gamma-test.jpg

gamma-test.jpg

642 ms

ArpitGoel.jpg

ArpitGoel.jpg

670 ms

logo.png

logo.png

670 ms

founder.png

founder.png

684 ms

logo.png

logo.png

689 ms

founder.png

founder.png

699 ms

wise-test.jpg

wise-test.jpg

704 ms

BilalAbidi.jpg

BilalAbidi.jpg

732 ms

happycredit-test.jpg

happycredit-test.jpg

737 ms

JitendraKumar.jpg

JitendraKumar.jpg

746 ms

orangeHealth.png

orangeHealth.png

631 ms

founder.png

founder.png

590 ms

nationalDesign.png

nationalDesign.png

590 ms

nift.png

nift.png

615 ms

uid.png

uid.png

608 ms

idc.png

idc.png

611 ms

amity.png

amity.png

542 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

20 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

38 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff

47 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff

48 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

48 ms

thumbnail.png

thumbnail.png

611 ms

thumbnail.png

thumbnail.png

581 ms

powerfulclientworld.jpg

powerfulclientworld.jpg

548 ms

Accessibility Review

penonpaper.in accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

penonpaper.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

penonpaper.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Penonpaper.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Penonpaper.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

penonpaper.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pen On Paper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: