Tools & Wizards About Us
peoplebehindthescience.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

peoplebehindthescience.com

People Behind the Science Podcast - Science Podcast - Journey through the minds of today's brilliant scientists

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

458 ms

Resources Loaded

959 ms

Page Rendered

609 ms

peoplebehindthescience.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to peoplebehindthescience.com homepage info - get ready to check People Behind The Science best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about peoplebehindthescience.com

Science Podcast - Journey through the minds of today's brilliant scientists

Visit peoplebehindthescience.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Peoplebehindthescience.com page load time and found that the first response time was 458 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

peoplebehindthescience.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,010 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.peoplebehindthescience.com

458 ms

font-awesome.css

21 ms

css

36 ms

style.css

16 ms

audio-player.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Peoplebehindthescience.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (458 ms) belongs to the original domain Peoplebehindthescience.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 476.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Peoplebehindthescience.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 35.8 kB

  • Original 43.4 kB
  • After minification 35.1 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. People Behind The Science images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 305.3 kB

  • Original 456.7 kB
  • After minification 450.8 kB
  • After compression 151.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 305.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 115.9 kB

  • Original 165.7 kB
  • After minification 139.8 kB
  • After compression 49.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peoplebehindthescience.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (62%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of People Behind The Science. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.peoplebehindthescience.com

www.peoplebehindthescience.com

458 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

21 ms

css

css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

16 ms

audio-player.css

audio-player.css

21 ms

reveal.css

reveal.css

21 ms

spp-tweet-styles.css

spp-tweet-styles.css

21 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

24 ms

css

css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

21 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

23 ms

form-themes.min.css

form-themes.min.css

22 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

25 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

21 ms

audio-player.js

audio-player.js

24 ms

jquery.reveal.js

jquery.reveal.js

23 ms

rotator.js

rotator.js

23 ms

responsive-menu.js

responsive-menu.js

23 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

23 ms

load.sumome.com

load.sumome.com

422 ms

custom.css

custom.css

21 ms

d248cfc54f979fafe4532ce988b4d87c.js

d248cfc54f979fafe4532ce988b4d87c.js

320 ms

wp-tiles.css

wp-tiles.css

18 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

19 ms

wp-tiles.min.js

wp-tiles.min.js

18 ms

player.min.js

player.min.js

18 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

105 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

254 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

247 ms

count.js

count.js

246 ms

People-Behind-the-Science-interviews-scientist-logo-4.gif

People-Behind-the-Science-interviews-scientist-logo-4.gif

188 ms

Franck_Polleux_People_Behind_the_Science-1024x683.jpg

Franck_Polleux_People_Behind_the_Science-1024x683.jpg

190 ms

Russell_Foster_People_Behind_the_Science-1024x908.jpg

Russell_Foster_People_Behind_the_Science-1024x908.jpg

194 ms

Brendan-Frey-People-Behind-the-Science-1024x1024.jpg

Brendan-Frey-People-Behind-the-Science-1024x1024.jpg

191 ms

Erin-Hodgson-People-Behind-the-Science-682x1024.jpg

Erin-Hodgson-People-Behind-the-Science-682x1024.jpg

190 ms

Roger-Smith-People-Behind-the-Science-707x1024.jpg

Roger-Smith-People-Behind-the-Science-707x1024.jpg

189 ms

Jill_Pruetz_People_Behind_the_Science.jpg

Jill_Pruetz_People_Behind_the_Science.jpg

187 ms

Jim-Tour-People-Behind-the-Science-1024x768.jpg

Jim-Tour-People-Behind-the-Science-1024x768.jpg

191 ms

Maria-Marco-People-Behind-the-Science-2-765x1024.gif

Maria-Marco-People-Behind-the-Science-2-765x1024.gif

196 ms

Eric-Green-People-Behind-the-Science-1024x683.jpg

Eric-Green-People-Behind-the-Science-1024x683.jpg

190 ms

Mina-Bissell-People-Behind-the-Science-732x1024.jpg

Mina-Bissell-People-Behind-the-Science-732x1024.jpg

193 ms

ngc-4414-11139.jpg

ngc-4414-11139.jpg

197 ms

test-218181.jpg

test-218181.jpg

196 ms

JzRrPKdwEnE8F1TDmDLMUhxcROG_7vu2ubkyRjqgeRY.ttf

JzRrPKdwEnE8F1TDmDLMUhxcROG_7vu2ubkyRjqgeRY.ttf

190 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

191 ms

ssi-icomoon.woff

ssi-icomoon.woff

189 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

peoplebehindthescience.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

peoplebehindthescience.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

peoplebehindthescience.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peoplebehindthescience.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Peoplebehindthescience.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

peoplebehindthescience.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of People Behind The Science. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: