Tools & Wizards About Us
peoplepedia.world screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

peoplepedia.world

Share Your Life Stories Online, Wikipedia for the People | Peoplepedia

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

169 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

97 ms

peoplepedia.world screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Peoplepedia content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about peoplepedia.world

 Share your life story online today! If you wanted to get your own Wikipedia page but don't qualify, try Peoplepedia instead. Get your own Wikipedia page.

Visit peoplepedia.world

Key Findings

We analyzed Peoplepedia.world page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

peoplepedia.world performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.688

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

peoplepedia.world

169 ms

www.peoplepedia.org

423 ms

css_rEI_5cK_B9hB4So2yZUtr5weuEV3heuAllCDE6XsIkI.css

32 ms

css_Cigxrb0whhfyIFqmqOZZCqgXfe1DvABmLcDn6Vzv0Fw.css

40 ms

css_FVNnG1QMQPlt9Y2-NSr8Hpfgs8ybV0iPNxe3lwWm1Ho.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Peoplepedia.world, 70% (19 requests) were made to Peoplepedia.org and 7% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (423 ms) relates to the external source Peoplepedia.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 31.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

300.5 kB

After Optimization

268.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Peoplepedia.world main page is 300.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 33.8 kB
  • After minification 33.7 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Peoplepedia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 220.7 kB
  • After minification 220.2 kB
  • After compression 211.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 39.9 kB
  • After minification 39.9 kB
  • After compression 39.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peoplepedia.world has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (78%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Peoplepedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

peoplepedia.world

peoplepedia.world

169 ms

www.peoplepedia.org

www.peoplepedia.org

423 ms

css_rEI_5cK_B9hB4So2yZUtr5weuEV3heuAllCDE6XsIkI.css

css_rEI_5cK_B9hB4So2yZUtr5weuEV3heuAllCDE6XsIkI.css

32 ms

css_Cigxrb0whhfyIFqmqOZZCqgXfe1DvABmLcDn6Vzv0Fw.css

css_Cigxrb0whhfyIFqmqOZZCqgXfe1DvABmLcDn6Vzv0Fw.css

40 ms

css_FVNnG1QMQPlt9Y2-NSr8Hpfgs8ybV0iPNxe3lwWm1Ho.css

css_FVNnG1QMQPlt9Y2-NSr8Hpfgs8ybV0iPNxe3lwWm1Ho.css

63 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

63 ms

css_8Yj4Poh0Nje2aTCpkc8NFO7W2P35YA1ycIdpU2GhTjg.css

css_8Yj4Poh0Nje2aTCpkc8NFO7W2P35YA1ycIdpU2GhTjg.css

42 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

30 ms

js_AUkJoLLfIxAS5XEYSz1fvs6qcLTERGHnR3qiWbLCvgA.js

js_AUkJoLLfIxAS5XEYSz1fvs6qcLTERGHnR3qiWbLCvgA.js

100 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

58 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

102 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

98 ms

cd-top-arrow.svg

cd-top-arrow.svg

19 ms

search-icon.jpg

search-icon.jpg

18 ms

main.js

main.js

63 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

63 ms

js_ZGe67Xli1MSdjcAlEbceI46J0lUv-0lJ80qwgT43pm0.js

js_ZGe67Xli1MSdjcAlEbceI46J0lUv-0lJ80qwgT43pm0.js

61 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

315 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

65 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

107 ms

js_HZtFH7ulksS8cqvrMHuqUp-1XIjVPYsduwPBXFA_Ltw.js

js_HZtFH7ulksS8cqvrMHuqUp-1XIjVPYsduwPBXFA_Ltw.js

60 ms

js_onbE0n0cQY6KTDQtHO_E27UBymFC-RuqypZZ6Zxez-o.js

js_onbE0n0cQY6KTDQtHO_E27UBymFC-RuqypZZ6Zxez-o.js

17 ms

js_YA835jeOV-1902dDZEGu56PLt5mPg78hzx1Ph4FKRUo.js

js_YA835jeOV-1902dDZEGu56PLt5mPg78hzx1Ph4FKRUo.js

16 ms

js_axzS5ofRQcQJ-FqrMBISCFdeupoWq9UeEKYl0Sjm_VI.js

js_axzS5ofRQcQJ-FqrMBISCFdeupoWq9UeEKYl0Sjm_VI.js

27 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

112 ms

js_AUkJoLLfIxAS5XEYSz1fvs6qcLTERGHnR3qiWbLCvgA.js

js_AUkJoLLfIxAS5XEYSz1fvs6qcLTERGHnR3qiWbLCvgA.js

83 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

44 ms

Accessibility Review

peoplepedia.world accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

peoplepedia.world best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

peoplepedia.world SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peoplepedia.world can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Peoplepedia.world main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

peoplepedia.world

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Peoplepedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: