Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    47% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    96% of websites

pep.security

Privacy by Default | p≡p Security | p≡p Security

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

376 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

pep.security screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pep.security homepage info - get ready to check Pep best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about pep.security

p≡p - pretty Easy privacy - shifting the default for written digital messages from unencrypted and unprotected to anonymized and encrypted.

Visit pep.security

Key Findings

We analyzed Pep.security page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pep.security performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pep.security

376 ms

334 ms

mezzanine.css

101 ms

bootstrap-theme.css

198 ms

slick.css

295 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Pep.security and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (655 ms) belongs to the original domain Pep.security.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 313.5 kB (78%)

Content Size

403.9 kB

After Optimization

90.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Pep.security main page is 403.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 34.4 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.0 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 177.5 kB

  • Original 244.1 kB
  • After minification 220.0 kB
  • After compression 66.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 106.9 kB

  • Original 125.3 kB
  • After minification 104.3 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pep.security needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (39%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pep.security accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

pep.security best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pep.security SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pep.security can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pep.security main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pep. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: