1.7 sec in total
148 ms
1.5 sec
116 ms
Click here to check amazing Perfectingfaith content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about perfectingfaith.org
This domain may be for sale!
Visit perfectingfaith.orgWe analyzed Perfectingfaith.org page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
perfectingfaith.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value410 ms
66/100
30%
Value1.202
1/100
15%
Value14.5 s
8/100
10%
148 ms
268 ms
83 ms
62 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Perfectingfaith.org, 74% (31 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 12% (5 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) relates to the external source Static.parastorage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (77%)
2.9 MB
666.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Perfectingfaith.org main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Perfectingfaith.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (73%)
40
11
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perfectingfaith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
perfectingfaith.org
148 ms
www.perfectingfaith.com
268 ms
bt
83 ms
require.min.js
62 ms
main-r.min.js
72 ms
viewer.css
65 ms
UpgradeBrowser.js
66 ms
ugc-viewer
37 ms
dynamicmodel
138 ms
5f2bf7_3bb2aefd0c78cb79be6ca6e5f83610b2_1984.json.z
192 ms
5f2bf7_b4e9aa106a06000db34f589417bfcae3_1979.json.z
63 ms
bt
134 ms
skins.min.js
455 ms
components.min.js
134 ms
utils.min.js
131 ms
core.min.js
71 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
121 ms
lodash.min.js
28 ms
TweenMax.min.js
120 ms
layout.min.js
123 ms
tpa.min.js
122 ms
fonts.min.js
119 ms
animations.min.js
123 ms
swfobject.min.js
127 ms
mousetrap.min.js
124 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
250 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
124 ms
react-dom.min.js
167 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
125 ms
widgets.min.js
249 ms
experiment.js
248 ms
render.min.js
248 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
435 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
436 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
436 ms
zepto.min.js
247 ms
color.min.js
432 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
28 ms
bt
253 ms
dc.js
227 ms
bt
138 ms
latin.css
137 ms
perfectingfaith.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
perfectingfaith.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
perfectingfaith.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perfectingfaith.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Perfectingfaith.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
perfectingfaith.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: