5.6 sec in total
437 ms
4.7 sec
416 ms
Visit performance-web.com now to see the best up-to-date Performance Web content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about performance-web.com
Web and software development specialists, delivering your designs as websites and apps. Specialists in WordPress, .Net, PHP, Salesforce and MS Dynamics.
Visit performance-web.comWe analyzed Performance-web.com page load time and found that the first response time was 437 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Performance-web.com rating and web reputation
performance-web.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
437 ms
442 ms
1874 ms
93 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Performance-web.com, 73% (73 requests) were made to Kloc.co.uk and 8% (8 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Kloc.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (24%)
5.0 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Performance-web.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 389.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Performance Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 626.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 626.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Performance-web.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (49%)
88
45
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Performance Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
performance-web.com
437 ms
www.performance-web.com
442 ms
kloc.co.uk
1874 ms
bootstrap.css
93 ms
reset.css
162 ms
style.css
245 ms
responsive-styles.css
168 ms
unoSlider.css
164 ms
slicknav.css
166 ms
easy-responsive-tabs.css
183 ms
jquery.js
329 ms
js
26 ms
gmaps.js
323 ms
modernizr.js
255 ms
sliding-panels.js
254 ms
responsiveslides.js
268 ms
main.js
322 ms
unoSlider.js
324 ms
jquery.fittext.js
387 ms
jquery.slicknav.js
389 ms
scrollTo.js
402 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.js
403 ms
Transition.js
404 ms
plugin_styles.css
420 ms
color-picker.min.css
419 ms
styles.css
441 ms
pagenavi-css.css
485 ms
admin_style.min.css
487 ms
jquery.js
576 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
498 ms
jquery.form.min.js
489 ms
scripts.js
527 ms
masonry.min.js
668 ms
who.js
457 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
350 ms
ga.js
175 ms
pw-logo.png
253 ms
Kloc-logo.jpg
335 ms
slider-bg.png
610 ms
1.png
257 ms
2.png
259 ms
3.png
255 ms
4.png
330 ms
5.png
260 ms
audience-bg.png
672 ms
1-50x50.png
332 ms
2-50x50.png
332 ms
3-50x50.png
411 ms
4-50x50.png
410 ms
5-50x50.png
412 ms
ctn.png
502 ms
continental-travelnurse-monitor.png
791 ms
Image1.jpg
501 ms
axial-screen.png
667 ms
nomadic.gif
608 ms
nomadic-screen12.png
746 ms
image001.jpg
692 ms
stewarts-coaches-mobile.png
999 ms
CM-Logic-logo.png
754 ms
cm-logic-laptop.png
849 ms
schoollogo1-e1413809489713.png
870 ms
iphone.png
947 ms
clinimed_logo.gif
875 ms
ipad1.png
980 ms
testimonial-bg.png
1027 ms
twitter.jpg
970 ms
find-us.png
983 ms
phone.png
1037 ms
email.png
1067 ms
common.js
152 ms
map.js
151 ms
util.js
152 ms
marker.js
149 ms
linkedin.png
934 ms
twitter.png
937 ms
__utm.gif
83 ms
GothamBook-webfont.woff
895 ms
GothamMedium-webfont.woff
910 ms
icomoon.ttf
910 ms
GothamBold-webfont.woff
926 ms
who.ashx
145 ms
onion.js
36 ms
contact-bg.png
1014 ms
arrow.png
901 ms
ajax-loader.gif
913 ms
controls.js
15 ms
stats.js
56 ms
transparent.png
29 ms
css
65 ms
spotlight-poi.png
47 ms
google4.png
42 ms
mapcnt6.png
60 ms
tmapctrl.png
22 ms
cb_scout5.png
72 ms
tmapctrl4.png
28 ms
imgs8.png
40 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
85 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
120 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
110 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
138 ms
performance-web.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
performance-web.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
performance-web.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Performance-web.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Performance-web.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
performance-web.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Performance Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: