Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

performancetools.com

Performance Tool / Wilmar LLC

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

19 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

551 ms

performancetools.com screenshot

About Website

Visit performancetools.com now to see the best up-to-date Performance Tool S content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about performancetools.com

Wilmar builds reliable automotive tools and accessories with top brands like Performance Tool that provide our “Guarantee of Satisfaction"

Visit performancetools.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Performancetools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 19 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

performancetools.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,990 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.929

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

performancetools.com

19 ms

wilmarllc.com

428 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

421 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

124 ms

webfont.js

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Performancetools.com, 71% (80 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Downloads.mailchimp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) relates to the external source Wilmarllc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 670.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

8.8 MB

After Optimization

8.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Performancetools.com main page is 8.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 513.9 kB

  • Original 580.8 kB
  • After minification 499.1 kB
  • After compression 66.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 81.7 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 513.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 7.8 MB
  • After minification 7.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Performance Tool S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 143.5 kB

  • Original 435.0 kB
  • After minification 435.0 kB
  • After compression 291.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 17.3 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Performancetools.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (27%)

Requests Now

107

After Optimization

78

The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Performance Tool S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

performancetools.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

performancetools.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

performancetools.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Performancetools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Performancetools.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Performance Tool S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: