2.1 sec in total
237 ms
1.7 sec
186 ms
Click here to check amazing Peridot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about peridot.in
DaaZ, largest domain marketplace simple, easy & secure platform to buy domain names. Buy this peridot.in Domain at best price at DaaZ.
Visit peridot.inWe analyzed Peridot.in page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
peridot.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.062
97/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
237 ms
265 ms
252 ms
128 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Peridot.in, 66% (29 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 27% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (793 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 121.6 kB (27%)
445.8 kB
324.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Peridot.in main page is 445.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 229.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Peridot needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 366 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peridot.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (48%)
40
21
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Peridot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
peridot.in
237 ms
peridot.in
265 ms
peridot.in
252 ms
googlefonts.css
128 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
152 ms
icon.css
151 ms
style4.css
195 ms
jquery.js
157 ms
fittext.js
168 ms
platform.js
269 ms
js
58 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
76 ms
logo.png
277 ms
trust-stamp.png
278 ms
paymentgateway-logos.svg
286 ms
tooltip-icon.png
293 ms
money-back1.png
307 ms
transfer1.png
387 ms
secure-payment1.png
391 ms
twitterX2.png
402 ms
money-back-w.png
408 ms
money-back-img1.png
426 ms
money-back-img2.png
423 ms
money-back-img3.png
501 ms
transper-img1.png
511 ms
transper-img2.png
513 ms
secure-payment-img1.png
528 ms
secure-payment-img2.png
793 ms
default
77 ms
sdk.js
331 ms
view
519 ms
fontello.woff
399 ms
main.js
17 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
23 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
46 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
20 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
24 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
22 ms
twk-main.js
23 ms
twk-vendor.js
33 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
46 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
36 ms
twk-runtime.js
43 ms
twk-app.js
42 ms
peridot.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
peridot.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
peridot.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peridot.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Peridot.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
peridot.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Peridot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: