1.1 sec in total
113 ms
789 ms
211 ms
Visit perihelionwebdesign.com now to see the best up-to-date Perihelion Web Design content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about perihelionwebdesign.com
Who Are We? Our team of designers and consultants have a track record for creating innovative web sites designed to suit customized requirements.
Visit perihelionwebdesign.comWe analyzed Perihelionwebdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 1000 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
perihelionwebdesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
113 ms
35 ms
25 ms
27 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Perihelionwebdesign.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) belongs to the original domain Perihelionwebdesign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 394.1 kB (60%)
652.7 kB
258.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Perihelionwebdesign.com main page is 652.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 244.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Perihelion Web Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 135.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.6 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Perihelionwebdesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (89%)
81
9
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perihelion Web Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
perihelionwebdesign.com
113 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
35 ms
layerslider.css
25 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
17 ms
dashicons.min.css
21 ms
desktop_style.css
18 ms
owl.carousel.css
45 ms
owl.theme.css
38 ms
owl.transitions.css
45 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
65 ms
nivo-slider.css
35 ms
jquery-ui.css
67 ms
icons.css
47 ms
style.css
49 ms
editor-content.css
66 ms
js_composer.css
67 ms
greensock.js
71 ms
jquery.js
103 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
98 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
100 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
101 ms
lfb_frontend.min.js
157 ms
front_end_script.js
153 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js
154 ms
owl.carousel.js
174 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
172 ms
front-end_functions.js
154 ms
js
23 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
170 ms
combobox-front.js
168 ms
checkbox.js
169 ms
jquery.radio.js
204 ms
scripts.js
199 ms
modernizr.custom.js
200 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
201 ms
drop-down-menu.js
202 ms
jquery.easing.js
201 ms
jquery.lazyLoading.js
206 ms
jquery.transform.js
202 ms
effect.min.js
202 ms
effect-drop.min.js
202 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
194 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
194 ms
jquery.fancybox-init.js
187 ms
widget.min.js
188 ms
core.min.js
178 ms
mouse.min.js
180 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
179 ms
position.min.js
163 ms
accordion.min.js
164 ms
tabs.min.js
163 ms
jquery-ui-init.js
161 ms
jquery.carouFredSel.js
137 ms
clients.js
132 ms
diagram_line.js
134 ms
raphael.js
131 ms
diagram_circle.js
82 ms
gallery.js
80 ms
jquery.juraSlider.js
81 ms
portfolio.js
80 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
66 ms
jquery.flatshadow.js
69 ms
quickfinder.js
66 ms
styled_image.js
66 ms
testimonials.js
66 ms
analytics.js
51 ms
Ekc-2SryrRc
198 ms
cloudflare.js
120 ms
loading.js
184 ms
wp-embed.min.js
181 ms
logolarge.png
181 ms
logosmall.png
181 ms
techlogos.png
181 ms
warning.png
179 ms
aileron-ultralight-webfont.woff
64 ms
aileron-light-webfont.woff
62 ms
aileron-thin-webfont.woff
62 ms
Codeus.ttf
59 ms
Codeus-Socials.ttf
60 ms
collect
32 ms
collect
121 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
120 ms
www-embed-player.js
145 ms
badge.js
28 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
41 ms
ad_status.js
49 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
34 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
perihelionwebdesign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
perihelionwebdesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
perihelionwebdesign.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perihelionwebdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Perihelionwebdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
perihelionwebdesign.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Perihelion Web Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: