Tools & Wizards About Us
perimeterwatch.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

perimeterwatch.com

PerimeterWatch | The digital security experts - Home

Page Load Speed

408 ms in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

333 ms

Page Rendered

63 ms

perimeterwatch.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Perimeter Watch content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about perimeterwatch.com

PerimeterWatch empowers today’s businesses with the latest in network security intelligence and infrastructure.

Visit perimeterwatch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Perimeterwatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 396 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

perimeterwatch.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

perimeterwatch.com

12 ms

perimeterwatch.com

39 ms

www.perimeterwatch.com

55 ms

app.css

23 ms

js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Perimeterwatch.com, 10% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Netlify-rum.netlify.app. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (143 ms) belongs to the original domain Perimeterwatch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.3 kB (84%)

Content Size

76.8 kB

After Optimization

12.5 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Perimeterwatch.com main page is 76.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 76.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 64.3 kB

  • Original 76.8 kB
  • After minification 60.1 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perimeter Watch. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

perimeterwatch.com

perimeterwatch.com

12 ms

perimeterwatch.com

perimeterwatch.com

39 ms

www.perimeterwatch.com

www.perimeterwatch.com

55 ms

app.css

app.css

23 ms

js

js

60 ms

app.js

app.js

101 ms

netlify-rum.js

netlify-rum.js

19 ms

Telegraf-Medium.woff

Telegraf-Medium.woff

92 ms

Telegraf-Regular.woff

Telegraf-Regular.woff

143 ms

Telegraf-SemiBold.woff

Telegraf-SemiBold.woff

143 ms

Accessibility Review

perimeterwatch.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

perimeterwatch.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

perimeterwatch.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perimeterwatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Perimeterwatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

perimeterwatch.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Perimeter Watch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: