Tools & Wizards About Us
perioprotectreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

perioprotectreview.com

Perio Protect Review - Gum Disease Treatment Review

Page Load Speed

667 ms in total

First Response

149 ms

Resources Loaded

398 ms

Page Rendered

120 ms

perioprotectreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit perioprotectreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Perio Protect Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about perioprotectreview.com

perio protect review, periodontal disease treatment review, gum disease treatment review, Perio Protect, non-surgical treatment for periodontal disease, gum disease and gingivitis, Painless, Non-Surgi...

Visit perioprotectreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Perioprotectreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 518 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

perioprotectreview.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

perioprotectreview.com

149 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

58 ms

menu_logo_top.gif

73 ms

menu_top.gif

107 ms

menu1.gif

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Perioprotectreview.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (169 ms) belongs to the original domain Perioprotectreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.9 kB (21%)

Content Size

67.5 kB

After Optimization

53.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Perioprotectreview.com main page is 67.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 48.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 48.3 kB
  • After minification 48.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Perio Protect Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 826 B

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 826 B or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perio Protect Review. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

perioprotectreview.com

perioprotectreview.com

149 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

AC_RunActiveContent.js

58 ms

menu_logo_top.gif

menu_logo_top.gif

73 ms

menu_top.gif

menu_top.gif

107 ms

menu1.gif

menu1.gif

109 ms

menu2.gif

menu2.gif

112 ms

menu3.gif

menu3.gif

108 ms

menu4.gif

menu4.gif

110 ms

menu5.gif

menu5.gif

125 ms

menu_middle.gif

menu_middle.gif

161 ms

topbar.gif

topbar.gif

163 ms

TopProducts-2013all-450.jpg

TopProducts-2013all-450.jpg

161 ms

bottom1.gif

bottom1.gif

168 ms

bottom_bg.gif

bottom_bg.gif

169 ms

Accessibility Review

perioprotectreview.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

perioprotectreview.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

perioprotectreview.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perioprotectreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Perioprotectreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

perioprotectreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Perio Protect Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: