Tools & Wizards About Us
perispect.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

perispect.com

E-Commerce Services to Maximize Profitability - Kaspien, Inc.

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

333 ms

perispect.com screenshot

About Website

Visit perispect.com now to see the best up-to-date Perispect content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about perispect.com

Drive rapid revenue growth on Amazon, Walmart, and Target with customized solutions for your e-commerce brand with Kaspien’s e-commerce services.

Visit perispect.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Perispect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

perispect.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,670 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.092

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

perispect.com

104 ms

www.perispect.com

703 ms

universal.css

38 ms

prototype.js

116 ms

validation.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Perispect.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Etaliz.actonservice.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) belongs to the original domain Perispect.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 346.4 kB (48%)

Content Size

723.4 kB

After Optimization

377.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Perispect.com main page is 723.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 416.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 10.1 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 260.4 kB
  • After minification 258.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Perispect images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 308.9 kB

  • Original 416.9 kB
  • After minification 329.9 kB
  • After compression 108.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 36.1 kB
  • After minification 35.6 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Perispect.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perispect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

perispect.com

perispect.com

104 ms

www.perispect.com

www.perispect.com

703 ms

universal.css

universal.css

38 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

116 ms

validation.js

validation.js

73 ms

builder.js

builder.js

74 ms

effects.js

effects.js

74 ms

js.js

js.js

78 ms

form.js

form.js

75 ms

translate.js

translate.js

105 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

106 ms

ccard.js

ccard.js

107 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

152 ms

universal.js

universal.js

112 ms

jquery.slides.min.js

jquery.slides.min.js

139 ms

marketing.css

marketing.css

138 ms

marketing.js

marketing.js

141 ms

ga.js

ga.js

31 ms

visitor.gif

visitor.gif

501 ms

perispect_loader.gif

perispect_loader.gif

41 ms

marketing-logo-tm.png

marketing-logo-tm.png

36 ms

slider-upper-tm.jpg

slider-upper-tm.jpg

177 ms

carrot-orange-right.png

carrot-orange-right.png

42 ms

module-icons.png

module-icons.png

40 ms

slider-lower-tm.jpg

slider-lower-tm.jpg

103 ms

Gotham-Light.woff

Gotham-Light.woff

108 ms

Gotham-Thin.woff

Gotham-Thin.woff

75 ms

Gotham-Medium.woff

Gotham-Medium.woff

140 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

perispect.com accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

perispect.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

perispect.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perispect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Perispect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

perispect.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Perispect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: