5 sec in total
978 ms
2.8 sec
1.2 sec
Visit peterjoy.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Peter Joy content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about peterjoy.co.uk
Visit peterjoy.co.ukWe analyzed Peterjoy.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 978 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
peterjoy.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
2/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value2,290 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.166
71/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
978 ms
79 ms
180 ms
272 ms
353 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Peterjoy.co.uk, 14% (9 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (978 ms) belongs to the original domain Peterjoy.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 125.6 kB (11%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Peterjoy.co.uk main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 483.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Peter Joy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peterjoy.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (79%)
58
12
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Peter Joy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
peterjoy.co.uk
978 ms
js
79 ms
style.min.css
180 ms
styles.css
272 ms
style.css
353 ms
slick.min.css
41 ms
lightbox.min.css
49 ms
style.css
270 ms
wppf.carousel.css
279 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
278 ms
simple-lightbox.min.css
275 ms
magnific-popup.css
356 ms
font-awesome.min.css
357 ms
wppf.css
358 ms
jquery.min.js
446 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
361 ms
js
113 ms
jquery.cookie.js
434 ms
jquery.matchHeight.js
434 ms
jquery.truncate.min.js
436 ms
wppf.carousel.min.js
440 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
531 ms
simple-lightbox.jquery.min.js
517 ms
magnific-popup.js
517 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
518 ms
infobubble-compiled.js
523 ms
wppf_google_map.js
527 ms
wppf.js
598 ms
index.js
586 ms
index.js
586 ms
navigation.js
586 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
66 ms
slick.min.js
74 ms
lightbox.min.js
85 ms
script.js
586 ms
cookie-box.js
586 ms
scripts.js
587 ms
api.js
153 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
588 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
586 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
676 ms
index.js
589 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
600 ms
bullet.svg
154 ms
stroud-from-above.jpg
566 ms
location-marker.svg
155 ms
HelveticaNeue.woff
385 ms
HelveticaNeue-Light.woff
247 ms
HelveticaNeue-Thin.woff
384 ms
HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff
450 ms
recaptcha__en.js
31 ms
anchor
102 ms
peter-joy.svg
101 ms
prev.png
89 ms
next.png
94 ms
loading.gif
95 ms
close.png
95 ms
styles__ltr.css
88 ms
recaptcha__en.js
93 ms
sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js
84 ms
webworker.js
80 ms
logo_48.png
66 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
34 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
38 ms
recaptcha__en.js
22 ms
peterjoy.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
peterjoy.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
peterjoy.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peterjoy.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Peterjoy.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
peterjoy.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Peter Joy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: