8.2 sec in total
1.8 sec
6.2 sec
296 ms
Visit pharmareview.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Pharma Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pharmareview.co.uk
WORLD LEADING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUSINESS. PharmaReview, an IQVIA business, providing copy review services to the life science industry
Visit pharmareview.co.ukWe analyzed Pharmareview.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
pharmareview.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value5.7 s
50/100
10%
Value1,680 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
1769 ms
354 ms
179 ms
180 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Pharmareview.co.uk, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Pharmareview.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (82%)
2.3 MB
409.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Pharmareview.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pharma Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 477.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 477.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pharmareview.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (87%)
67
9
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pharma Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pharmareview.co.uk
1769 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
354 ms
style.css
179 ms
style.css
180 ms
bbpress.css
375 ms
settings.css
484 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
css
36 ms
bootstrap.css
784 ms
flexslider.css
282 ms
style.css
802 ms
animate.min.css
651 ms
prettyPhoto.css
572 ms
owl-carousel.css
492 ms
royalslider.css
582 ms
jquery.rating.css
679 ms
rs-default-inverted.css
740 ms
rs-universal.css
759 ms
css
30 ms
dark-style.css
1254 ms
ohover.css
1241 ms
rd-hover-gird
2113 ms
rdresponsive.css
952 ms
style.css
1040 ms
style_com.css
991 ms
js_composer.css
2252 ms
video-js.css
1265 ms
kg-video-js-skin.css
1391 ms
kgvid_styles.css
1431 ms
prettyphoto.css
1517 ms
nimble-portfolio.css
1443 ms
skin.css
1566 ms
jquery.js
2086 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1616 ms
main.js
1689 ms
jquery.mobile.min.js
1941 ms
responsiveslides.js
1791 ms
main.js
1879 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2404 ms
colors.css
1989 ms
easy-columns.css
2035 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2331 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2486 ms
editor.js
2015 ms
bootstrap.js
2273 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2374 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
1974 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
2104 ms
countdown.js
2112 ms
wow.min.js
2006 ms
menu.js
2087 ms
add_bookmark.js
2093 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
2090 ms
jquery.rating.js
2163 ms
custom.js
2133 ms
scripts.js
2003 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1969 ms
prettyphoto.js
2172 ms
sort.js
1777 ms
js_composer_front.js
2029 ms
genericons.css
1771 ms
PharmaSpinner200.png
144 ms
pharmareview-logo-web.png
450 ms
logo-copyreview-228.png
309 ms
logo-smartreference-228.png
311 ms
logo-processdesign-228.png
311 ms
green-tick-circle.png
409 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
43 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
43 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
44 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
45 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
477 ms
AkzidenzGroteskBQ-Light.otf
383 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
44 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
41 ms
arrow.png
292 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
668 ms
pharmareview.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
pharmareview.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
pharmareview.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pharmareview.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pharmareview.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pharmareview.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pharma Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: