2.1 sec in total
407 ms
1.5 sec
190 ms
Welcome to philit.com homepage info - get ready to check PHILIT best content right away, or after learning these important things about philit.com
PHILIT Inc., an Orange county based firm, provides IT related solutions to its clients primarily engaged in hospitality industry. PHILIT's services includes property management software application, c...
Visit philit.comWe analyzed Philit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 407 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
philit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
33/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.075
95/100
15%
Value7.8 s
45/100
10%
407 ms
52 ms
169 ms
150 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Philit.com, 19% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) belongs to the original domain Philit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 136.2 kB (16%)
845.2 kB
709.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Philit.com main page is 845.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 535.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, PHILIT needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Philit.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (76%)
63
15
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PHILIT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
philit.com
407 ms
style.css
52 ms
jquery.min.js
169 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
150 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
161 ms
caption.js
168 ms
bootstrap.min.js
168 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
168 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
204 ms
jquery-ui-addons.js
277 ms
jd.gallery.jquery.js
223 ms
jd.gallery.transitions.jquery.js
224 ms
bootstrap-default-min.css
222 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
219 ms
font-awesome.min.css
254 ms
ionicons.min.css
271 ms
css
44 ms
s5_flex_menu-min.js
273 ms
s5_flex_menu.css
273 ms
system.css
274 ms
general.css
309 ms
template.css
322 ms
editor.css
325 ms
thirdparty.css
326 ms
css
44 ms
multibox.css
328 ms
ajax.css
329 ms
overlay.js
354 ms
multibox.js
372 ms
s5_font_adjuster-min.js
374 ms
s5_responsive_bars-min.css
376 ms
s5_responsive_hide_classes-min.css
377 ms
s5_responsive.css
376 ms
custom.css
402 ms
s5_info_slide-min.css
422 ms
s5_info_slide-min.js
424 ms
s5_columns_equalizer-min.js
427 ms
css
51 ms
s5_responsive_mobile_bar-min.js
425 ms
widget.js
204 ms
system.css
123 ms
us.gif
169 ms
9383-566719
64 ms
9383
58 ms
search_light.png
63 ms
arrow_light.png
61 ms
login_sidebar_light.png
58 ms
register_sidebar_light.png
61 ms
controller_error.png
61 ms
world_link.png
59 ms
color_wheel.png
126 ms
menu_light.png
126 ms
logo.png
126 ms
slide-1.jpg
212 ms
slide-7.jpg
161 ms
slide-2.jpg
164 ms
slide-3.jpg
220 ms
slide-4.jpg
220 ms
slide-5.jpg
212 ms
slide-6.jpg
270 ms
s5imagecontent.css
167 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
40 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
46 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
47 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
163 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf
56 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
46 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
56 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
55 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
72 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
73 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
71 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
71 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
71 ms
ionicons.ttf
306 ms
9383
72 ms
s5_right_column_shadow.png
55 ms
s5_scroll_arrow.png
53 ms
widget_app_base_1717788738291.js
19 ms
philit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
philit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
philit.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Philit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Philit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
philit.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PHILIT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: