Tools & Wizards About Us
phillipsmasonrywork.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

phillipsmasonrywork.com

Phillips Masonry | Brick Pointing & Masonry Work | Pittsburgh PA

Page Load Speed

21.6 sec in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

21.5 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

phillipsmasonrywork.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Phillips Masonry Work content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phillipsmasonrywork.com

Phillips Masonry is the best choice in Pittsburgh & surrounding areas for all your masonry needs. Whether it's brick, block or stone, we can help! Call today!

Visit phillipsmasonrywork.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Phillipsmasonrywork.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 21.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

phillipsmasonrywork.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.phillipsmasonrywork.com

118 ms

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

92 ms

polyfill.min.js

20465 ms

js

94 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Phillipsmasonrywork.com, 40% (22 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (16 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 994.6 kB (69%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

446.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Phillipsmasonrywork.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 835.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 190.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 835.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 43.9 kB
  • After minification 38.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Phillips Masonry Work needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 153.7 kB

  • Original 371.5 kB
  • After minification 371.5 kB
  • After compression 217.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.7 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (36%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phillips Masonry Work. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.phillipsmasonrywork.com

www.phillipsmasonrywork.com

118 ms

minified.js

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

92 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

20465 ms

js

js

94 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

75 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

74 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

73 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

73 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

73 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

70 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

74 ms

masonry-03.png

masonry-03.png

306 ms

63861c_b983c25219b44dda9200a23433ee77c3~mv2.jpeg

63861c_b983c25219b44dda9200a23433ee77c3~mv2.jpeg

305 ms

63861c_39aa1f40c2d643ff8609dfaae2b7ec0f~mv2.jpg

63861c_39aa1f40c2d643ff8609dfaae2b7ec0f~mv2.jpg

389 ms

90ade8_49de53a7dfb041e490d7a3e467f51ff5~mv2.jpg

90ade8_49de53a7dfb041e490d7a3e467f51ff5~mv2.jpg

365 ms

63861c_279fd1f623824437a37109359cccd21f~mv2_d_3264_1840_s_2.jpg

63861c_279fd1f623824437a37109359cccd21f~mv2_d_3264_1840_s_2.jpg

374 ms

90ade8_cac84844edfb461ba4270ddd2e672413~mv2_d_4608_3456_s_4_2.jpg

90ade8_cac84844edfb461ba4270ddd2e672413~mv2_d_4608_3456_s_4_2.jpg

421 ms

unnamed%20(32).jpg

unnamed%20(32).jpg

461 ms

unnamed%20(15).jpg

unnamed%20(15).jpg

490 ms

unnamed%20(61)_edited.jpg

unnamed%20(61)_edited.jpg

551 ms

a3c153_37bd778220b64f369d9d9528cce39ed8~mv2.jpg

a3c153_37bd778220b64f369d9d9528cce39ed8~mv2.jpg

454 ms

nsplsh_eb835be8439b4ccebc2953e657905f2c~mv2.jpg

nsplsh_eb835be8439b4ccebc2953e657905f2c~mv2.jpg

737 ms

phillips-masonry-bbb-rating.png

phillips-masonry-bbb-rating.png

567 ms

63861c_1aeccc823a57471c999169e1ac22a5d9~mv2.png

63861c_1aeccc823a57471c999169e1ac22a5d9~mv2.png

658 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

91 ms

file.woff

file.woff

290 ms

file.woff

file.woff

369 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

16 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Md.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Md.woff

16 ms

50ac1699-f3d2-47b6-878f-67a368a17c41.woff

50ac1699-f3d2-47b6-878f-67a368a17c41.woff

6 ms

ca003289-5ee3-45c2-94ad-36c743c35fc1.woff

ca003289-5ee3-45c2-94ad-36c743c35fc1.woff

16 ms

49631ce8-9201-47a8-8874-45371417c35f.woff

49631ce8-9201-47a8-8874-45371417c35f.woff

7 ms

dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

6 ms

cgaIrkaP9Empe8_PwXbajD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

cgaIrkaP9Empe8_PwXbajD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

16 ms

file.woff

file.woff

388 ms

54 ms

6 ms

7 ms

8 ms

7 ms

8 ms

52 ms

62 ms

52 ms

63 ms

61 ms

101 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

7 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

16 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

4 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

10 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

7 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

phillipsmasonrywork.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

phillipsmasonrywork.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

phillipsmasonrywork.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phillipsmasonrywork.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phillipsmasonrywork.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

phillipsmasonrywork.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phillips Masonry Work. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: