Tools & Wizards About Us
philpem.me.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

philpem.me.uk

philpem's homepage [philpem.me.uk - Phil Pemberton's website]

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

137 ms

Resources Loaded

888 ms

Page Rendered

87 ms

philpem.me.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit philpem.me.uk now to see the best up-to-date Phil Pem content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about philpem.me.uk

philpem's homepage Latest changes Date Changes

Visit philpem.me.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Philpem.me.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 975 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

philpem.me.uk performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,700 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.817

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

philpem.me.uk

137 ms

style.css

57 ms

ga.js

8 ms

piwik.js

196 ms

banner.png

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Philpem.me.uk, 22% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (196 ms) belongs to the original domain Philpem.me.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.1 kB (46%)

Content Size

76.2 kB

After Optimization

41.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Philpem.me.uk main page is 76.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 62.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 6.0 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 925 B, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 62% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phil Pem images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 396 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Philpem.me.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phil Pem. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

philpem.me.uk

philpem.me.uk

137 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

196 ms

banner.png

banner.png

54 ms

phppow.png

phppow.png

56 ms

anybrowser.png

anybrowser.png

57 ms

slogo_html401.png

slogo_html401.png

59 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

Accessibility Review

philpem.me.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

philpem.me.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

philpem.me.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Philpem.me.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Philpem.me.uk main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

philpem.me.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Phil Pem. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: