Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

649 ms

Resources Loaded

968 ms

Page Rendered

193 ms

phonenumber.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Phonenumber content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phonenumber.net

Visit phonenumber.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Phonenumber.net page load time and found that the first response time was 649 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

phonenumber.net performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.233

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

phonenumber.net

649 ms

px.js

61 ms

px.js

66 ms

caf.js

42 ms

newcafv2.js

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Phonenumber.net, 17% (2 requests) were made to A.rmgserving.com and 17% (2 requests) were made to B.rmgserving.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) belongs to the original domain Phonenumber.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

120.4 kB

After Optimization

83.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Phonenumber.net main page is 120.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 63.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 26.2 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 21.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Phonenumber needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phonenumber. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

phonenumber.net accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

phonenumber.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

phonenumber.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    >

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phonenumber.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Phonenumber.net main page’s claimed encoding is >. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Phonenumber. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: