Tools & Wizards About Us
photo.services screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

photo.services

Index of /

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

541 ms

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

photo.services screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Photo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about photo.services

Visit photo.services

Key Findings

We analyzed Photo.services page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

photo.services performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

photo.services

75 ms

css2

61 ms

all.css

69 ms

bootstrap.min.css

46 ms

slick.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Photo.services, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pro.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) belongs to the original domain Photo.services.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.8 kB (6%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Photo.services main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 67.1 kB

  • Original 72.1 kB
  • After minification 36.9 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 35.2 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.1 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 146.4 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 425 B

  • Original 118.6 kB
  • After minification 118.6 kB
  • After compression 118.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 74.3 kB
  • After minification 74.3 kB
  • After compression 72.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photo.services has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (18%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

64

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

photo.services

photo.services

75 ms

css2

css2

61 ms

all.css

all.css

69 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

46 ms

slick.css

slick.css

24 ms

carouselTicker.css

carouselTicker.css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

31 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

80 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

59 ms

jquery.carouselTicker.min.js

jquery.carouselTicker.min.js

39 ms

start.js

start.js

54 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

58 ms

scrollIt.min.js

scrollIt.min.js

59 ms

custom.js

custom.js

77 ms

logo@2x.png

logo@2x.png

58 ms

banner-img1.png

banner-img1.png

78 ms

banner-img2.png

banner-img2.png

79 ms

banner-shap.png

banner-shap.png

274 ms

service-img.jpg

service-img.jpg

282 ms

service-tested-img1.png

service-tested-img1.png

85 ms

service-tested-img2.png

service-tested-img2.png

82 ms

service-tested-img3.png

service-tested-img3.png

86 ms

service-tested-img4.png

service-tested-img4.png

88 ms

tested-back.png

tested-back.png

276 ms

offer-lg1.svg

offer-lg1.svg

268 ms

offer-lg2.svg

offer-lg2.svg

95 ms

offer-lg3.svg

offer-lg3.svg

265 ms

offer-lg4.svg

offer-lg4.svg

271 ms

offer-lg5.svg

offer-lg5.svg

269 ms

offer-lg6.svg

offer-lg6.svg

276 ms

offer-lg7.svg

offer-lg7.svg

282 ms

offer-lg8.svg

offer-lg8.svg

280 ms

offer-lg9.svg

offer-lg9.svg

283 ms

offer-lg10.svg

offer-lg10.svg

277 ms

offer-lg11.svg

offer-lg11.svg

285 ms

offer-lg12.svg

offer-lg12.svg

286 ms

offer-lg13.svg

offer-lg13.svg

287 ms

offer-lg14.svg

offer-lg14.svg

288 ms

offer-lg15.svg

offer-lg15.svg

278 ms

offer-lg16.svg

offer-lg16.svg

276 ms

work-ic1.svg

work-ic1.svg

270 ms

css2

css2

40 ms

css2

css2

67 ms

work-ic2.svg

work-ic2.svg

263 ms

work-ic3.svg

work-ic3.svg

249 ms

work-ic4.svg

work-ic4.svg

250 ms

trusted-img1.svg

trusted-img1.svg

250 ms

trusted-img2.svg

trusted-img2.svg

246 ms

trusted-img3.svg

trusted-img3.svg

249 ms

trusted-img4.svg

trusted-img4.svg

247 ms

trusted-img5.svg

trusted-img5.svg

250 ms

trusted-img6.svg

trusted-img6.svg

231 ms

trusted-img7.svg

trusted-img7.svg

232 ms

trusted-img8.svg

trusted-img8.svg

233 ms

trusted-img9.svg

trusted-img9.svg

234 ms

trusted-img10.svg

trusted-img10.svg

247 ms

trusted-img11.svg

trusted-img11.svg

243 ms

customer-img.png

customer-img.png

330 ms

testimonial-back.png

testimonial-back.png

242 ms

sefty-ic1.svg

sefty-ic1.svg

182 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

182 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

214 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

259 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

260 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

258 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

260 ms

sefty-ic2.svg

sefty-ic2.svg

63 ms

sefty-ic3.svg

sefty-ic3.svg

104 ms

sefty-ic4.svg

sefty-ic4.svg

84 ms

twiter-ic.svg

twiter-ic.svg

101 ms

footer-img1@2x.png

footer-img1@2x.png

98 ms

footer-img2@2x.png

footer-img2@2x.png

98 ms

footer-img4@2x.png

footer-img4@2x.png

95 ms

footer-img6@2x.png

footer-img6@2x.png

131 ms

footer-img5@2x.png

footer-img5@2x.png

130 ms

footer-round.png

footer-round.png

128 ms

footer-round2.png

footer-round2.png

126 ms

footer-img3@2x.png

footer-img3@2x.png

124 ms

body-back.png

body-back.png

129 ms

banner-data-back.png

banner-data-back.png

124 ms

backgread.png

backgread.png

123 ms

right-shadow.png

right-shadow.png

123 ms

left-shadow.png

left-shadow.png

122 ms

contact-back.png

contact-back.png

124 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

58 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

95 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

96 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

98 ms

Accessibility Review

photo.services accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

photo.services best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

photo.services SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photo.services can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Photo.services main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

photo.services

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Photo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: