Tools & Wizards About Us
photofancy.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

photofancy.de

PhotoFancy.de - Bilder online bearbeiten und Fotogeschenke gestalten

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

554 ms

photofancy.de screenshot

About Website

Visit photofancy.de now to see the best up-to-date Photo Fancy content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about photofancy.de

Fotogeschenke selbst gestalten ✓ Personalisierte Geschenkideen ✓ Kreative Designs ✓ Einfache Gestaltung

Visit photofancy.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Photofancy.de page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

photofancy.de performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.314

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

photofancy.de

207 ms

www.photofancy.de

468 ms

3cc6673fccab35c63c8677fead762884.min.css

358 ms

js

83 ms

klarna.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Photofancy.de, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Js.klarna.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Photofancy.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 352.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Photofancy.de main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 184.0 kB

  • Original 212.4 kB
  • After minification 185.3 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 601.8 kB
  • After minification 601.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo Fancy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 244 B

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 1.6 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 167.7 kB

  • Original 231.1 kB
  • After minification 63.5 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photofancy.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 167.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo Fancy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

photofancy.de

photofancy.de

207 ms

www.photofancy.de

www.photofancy.de

468 ms

3cc6673fccab35c63c8677fead762884.min.css

3cc6673fccab35c63c8677fead762884.min.css

358 ms

js

js

83 ms

klarna.js

klarna.js

24 ms

c5aefc67459dfe476dbb430028d648dd.min.js

c5aefc67459dfe476dbb430028d648dd.min.js

1021 ms

consent.js

consent.js

544 ms

v2

v2

51 ms

bat.js

bat.js

137 ms

pf_logo_light.svg

pf_logo_light.svg

179 ms

Loader.gif

Loader.gif

269 ms

Loader.gif

Loader.gif

357 ms

PhotoFancy-Logo_white.png

PhotoFancy-Logo_white.png

358 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-regular.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-regular.woff

375 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-300.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-300.woff

272 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-600.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-600.woff

376 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-700.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-700.woff

447 ms

lined-icons.woff

lined-icons.woff

472 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

360 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

473 ms

Luma-Icons.woff

Luma-Icons.woff

475 ms

js-translation.json

js-translation.json

182 ms

banner.no-autoblock.js

banner.no-autoblock.js

136 ms

X30FC51754D48C92C43CC8ED28128A78C.js

X30FC51754D48C92C43CC8ED28128A78C.js

519 ms

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

116 ms

jquery_lazyload.min.js

jquery_lazyload.min.js

112 ms

slider-aktuelles-startseite-pf_de.jpg

slider-aktuelles-startseite-pf_de.jpg

186 ms

slider-faceswap-fussball-tasse_pf.jpg

slider-faceswap-fussball-tasse_pf.jpg

631 ms

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

92 ms

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

92 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

92 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

91 ms

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

a1efa6d909793095643ac00cb3e97600.min.css

91 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

91 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

90 ms

Accessibility Review

photofancy.de accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

photofancy.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

photofancy.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photofancy.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Photofancy.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

photofancy.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Photo Fancy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: