Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

photographyoptions.net

Dedicated Hosting Server

Page Load Speed

871 ms in total

First Response

228 ms

Resources Loaded

525 ms

Page Rendered

118 ms

photographyoptions.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to photographyoptions.net homepage info - get ready to check Photographyoptions best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about photographyoptions.net

Visit photographyoptions.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Photographyoptions.net page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 643 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

photographyoptions.net performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

photographyoptions.net

228 ms

background.gif

139 ms

clear.gif

131 ms

header.jpg

259 ms

main.jpg

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Photographyoptions.net, 80% (4 requests) were made to Images.secureserver.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (350 ms) relates to the external source Images.secureserver.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

48.2 kB

After Optimization

40.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Photographyoptions.net main page is 48.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 45.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 818 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 39.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Photographyoptions needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photographyoptions. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

photographyoptions.net accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

photographyoptions.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

photographyoptions.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photographyoptions.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Photographyoptions.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Photographyoptions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: