3.9 sec in total
494 ms
3.3 sec
94 ms
Click here to check amazing Photo Line content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about photoline.ru
фотографии, фотогалереи, теория фотографии, фотоконкурсы, профессиональная и любительская фотография, новости фотографии. Покупка и продажа фототехники. Стихи и рассказы. Фотомодели
Visit photoline.ruWe analyzed Photoline.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 494 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
photoline.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value1,670 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
494 ms
837 ms
110 ms
388 ms
1005 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Photoline.ru, 17% (15 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (11 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 39.6 kB (4%)
919.3 kB
879.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Photoline.ru main page is 919.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 669.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 990 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo Line images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photoline.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (62%)
74
28
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo Line. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
photoline.ru
494 ms
www.photoline.ru
837 ms
adsbygoogle.js
110 ms
main.css
388 ms
context.js
1005 ms
show_ads_impl.js
372 ms
adsbygoogle.js
103 ms
adsbygoogle.js
99 ms
top100.jcn
307 ms
logo
242 ms
pusto.gif
128 ms
head_l.gif
165 ms
head_r.gif
503 ms
04.gif
254 ms
14.gif
253 ms
15.gif
259 ms
13.gif
260 ms
1714287679.jpg
390 ms
1146720694.jpg
506 ms
01.gif
380 ms
1714891467.jpg
388 ms
1714623566.jpg
519 ms
1713157408.jpg
506 ms
1714729191.jpg
517 ms
1714851240.jpg
520 ms
1714681164.jpg
628 ms
06.gif
636 ms
12.gif
636 ms
hit
249 ms
top100.jcn
912 ms
zrt_lookup.html
37 ms
ads
702 ms
ads
392 ms
ads
660 ms
hit
738 ms
gen_204
302 ms
pixel
300 ms
801186511295905804
40 ms
abg_lite.js
9 ms
omrhp.js
27 ms
46 ms
moatad.js
45 ms
Q12zgMmT.js
39 ms
window_focus.js
46 ms
qs_click_protection.js
104 ms
ufs_web_display.js
27 ms
icon.png
34 ms
62bHydCX.html
244 ms
pixel.gif
286 ms
activeview
183 ms
pixel
184 ms
3143348870206110726
157 ms
gen_204
110 ms
pixel
132 ms
pixel
132 ms
counter2
319 ms
reactive_library.js
198 ms
ca-pub-1174934703870184
212 ms
FAz5UgRug7M8YaGFfFWxr9vetrg5Yv9xXEx-zc6kZAs.js
25 ms
pixel.gif
31 ms
activeview
74 ms
rum
60 ms
pixel
20 ms
bounce
17 ms
pixel
21 ms
rum
33 ms
ads
153 ms
15118016939771844198
85 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
83 ms
abg_lite.js
81 ms
bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js
135 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
79 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
84 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
147 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
149 ms
counter2
146 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
67 ms
7167769925268475647
67 ms
css
42 ms
css
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
15 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
58 ms
sodar
88 ms
activeview
68 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf
64 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf
65 ms
photoline.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
photoline.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
photoline.ru SEO score
RU
RU
KOI8-R
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photoline.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Photoline.ru main page’s claimed encoding is koi8-r. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
photoline.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Photo Line. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: