Tools & Wizards About Us
photoredact.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

photoredact.com

Best Photo Editing Company For Your Real Estate’s Property Image

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

677 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

photoredact.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Photo Redact content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about photoredact.com

Photoredact is the best choice to create professional images for real estate businesses. Real estate image editing can improve the quality of the picture and make it more presentable.

Visit photoredact.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Photoredact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 677 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

photoredact.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.55

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.4 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

photoredact.com

677 ms

www.photoredact.com

1378 ms

style.css

206 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

388 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

387 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Photoredact.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Photoredact.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.8 kB (2%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Photoredact.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 45.3 kB

  • Original 54.8 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo Redact images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 107.2 kB
  • After minification 107.0 kB
  • After compression 82.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 893 B

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 34.7 kB
  • After compression 33.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photoredact.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (31%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo Redact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

photoredact.com

photoredact.com

677 ms

www.photoredact.com

www.photoredact.com

1378 ms

style.css

style.css

206 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

388 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

387 ms

menu.css

menu.css

401 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

608 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

421 ms

faq.css

faq.css

418 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

580 ms

panorama360.css

panorama360.css

579 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

804 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

627 ms

bootstrap-tab.js

bootstrap-tab.js

629 ms

api.js

api.js

33 ms

css

css

30 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

967 ms

flaunt.js

flaunt.js

774 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

817 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

840 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

logo.png

logo.png

203 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

597 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

943 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

1231 ms

slide-4.jpg

slide-4.jpg

560 ms

slide-6.jpg

slide-6.jpg

785 ms

sky_replacement_thumb.jpg

sky_replacement_thumb.jpg

409 ms

sky_replacement.jpg

sky_replacement.jpg

1051 ms

4939_zeiglers_church_01_thumb.jpg

4939_zeiglers_church_01_thumb.jpg

750 ms

4939_zeiglers_church_01.jpg

4939_zeiglers_church_01.jpg

998 ms

253_wilson_01_thumb.jpg

253_wilson_01_thumb.jpg

941 ms

253_wilson_01.jpg

253_wilson_01.jpg

1182 ms

14674_moonlit_01_thumb.jpg

14674_moonlit_01_thumb.jpg

1132 ms

14674_moonlit_01.jpg

14674_moonlit_01.jpg

1326 ms

color_correction_thumb.jpg

color_correction_thumb.jpg

1201 ms

color_correction.jpg

color_correction.jpg

1452 ms

HDR-Images-thumb-3.jpg

HDR-Images-thumb-3.jpg

1322 ms

HDR-Images-3.jpg

HDR-Images-3.jpg

1384 ms

HDR-Images-thumb-2.jpg

HDR-Images-thumb-2.jpg

1405 ms

HDR-Images-2.jpg

HDR-Images-2.jpg

1446 ms

HDR-Images-thumb-1.jpg

HDR-Images-thumb-1.jpg

1511 ms

HDR-Images-1.jpg

HDR-Images-1.jpg

1520 ms

benifits-1.png

benifits-1.png

1587 ms

benifits-2.png

benifits-2.png

1617 ms

benifits-3.png

benifits-3.png

1657 ms

benifits-4.png

benifits-4.png

1655 ms

benifits-5.png

benifits-5.png

1702 ms

benifits-6.png

benifits-6.png

1714 ms

client.png

client.png

1787 ms

client2.png

client2.png

1818 ms

client1.png

client1.png

1857 ms

quick-contact.png

quick-contact.png

2949 ms

menu-bdr.png

menu-bdr.png

1883 ms

pi-section-bg.jpg

pi-section-bg.jpg

1898 ms

title-line.png

title-line.png

1979 ms

our-featur-bg.jpg

our-featur-bg.jpg

2014 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

125 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

22 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

4 ms

js

js

67 ms

Rockwell.woff

Rockwell.woff

1863 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1675 ms

availibility-bg.jpg

availibility-bg.jpg

1540 ms

testimonial-bg.jpg

testimonial-bg.jpg

1594 ms

title-line-white.png

title-line-white.png

1478 ms

mail.png

mail.png

1485 ms

hamburger.png

hamburger.png

1335 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

1353 ms

slider-arrow-left.png

slider-arrow-left.png

1402 ms

slider-arrow-right.png

slider-arrow-right.png

1383 ms

Accessibility Review

photoredact.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

photoredact.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

photoredact.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photoredact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Photoredact.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

photoredact.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Photo Redact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: