2.9 sec in total
94 ms
1.6 sec
1.2 sec
Visit phpfox.us now to see the best up-to-date PhpFox content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about phpfox.us
phpFox is the best social network platform to build your own online communities easily; encourages users to interact and engage with much fun.
Visit phpfox.usWe analyzed Phpfox.us page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
phpfox.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.145
77/100
15%
Value13.3 s
11/100
10%
94 ms
68 ms
20 ms
40 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Phpfox.us, 70% (57 requests) were made to Phpfox.com and 19% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 530.6 kB (44%)
1.2 MB
688.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Phpfox.us main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 469.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 431.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 431.4 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, PhpFox needs image optimization as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phpfox.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (86%)
58
8
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PhpFox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
phpfox.us
94 ms
www.phpfox.com
68 ms
font-awesome.min.css
20 ms
mts-notification-bar-public.css
40 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
33 ms
template-frontend.min.css
43 ms
app.css
40 ms
style.css
44 ms
style.css
45 ms
bootstrap.min.css
51 ms
all.min.css
68 ms
feather.css
63 ms
font-awesome.css
48 ms
loader.min.css
63 ms
themify-icons.css
46 ms
magnific-popup.css
74 ms
animate.css
93 ms
app.css
97 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
91 ms
swiper.min.css
74 ms
post-6.css
76 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
77 ms
themify-icons.css
77 ms
elegant-icons.min.css
79 ms
flaticon.css
82 ms
global.css
83 ms
post-20189.css
84 ms
fontawesome.min.css
131 ms
solid.min.css
94 ms
jquery.min.js
237 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
234 ms
jquery.cookie.js
235 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
234 ms
jquery.appear.js
232 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
234 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
426 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
412 ms
css
406 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
421 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
418 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
399 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
398 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
398 ms
waypoints.min.js
397 ms
core.min.js
395 ms
frontend.min.js
393 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
391 ms
hooks.min.js
378 ms
i18n.min.js
378 ms
frontend.min.js
531 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
533 ms
tt_elementor_sections.js
524 ms
tt_elementor_column.js
524 ms
gtm.js
679 ms
background-finalllllll.png
636 ms
metafox-bg-trusted.png
607 ms
Feather.ttf
72 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
73 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
74 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
74 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
72 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff
30 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff
94 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff
160 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff
157 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff
160 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
160 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff
158 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff
157 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
162 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVQ.woff
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
163 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
163 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
164 ms
phpfox-logo.png
42 ms
landing-featured.png
67 ms
landing-featured0.png
68 ms
landing-featured7.png
131 ms
phpfox.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
phpfox.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
phpfox.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phpfox.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phpfox.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phpfox.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PhpFox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: