5.9 sec in total
1.6 sec
3.8 sec
488 ms
Visit phpipam.net now to see the best up-to-date PhpIPAM content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about phpipam.net
free open-source IP address management application (IPAM)
Visit phpipam.netWe analyzed Phpipam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
phpipam.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value3.6 s
62/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value5.0 s
77/100
10%
1628 ms
318 ms
316 ms
41 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Phpipam.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Phpipam.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (65%)
3.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Phpipam.net main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 167.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 325.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, PhpIPAM needs image optimization as it can save up to 325.9 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 990.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 990.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 509.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phpipam.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 509.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (65%)
52
18
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PhpIPAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
phpipam.net
1628 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
318 ms
layerslider.css
316 ms
css
41 ms
styles.css
201 ms
settings.css
401 ms
css
55 ms
style.css
897 ms
font-awesome.css
405 ms
ilightbox.css
533 ms
animations.css
433 ms
jquery.js
693 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
498 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.js
537 ms
jquery.lightbox.plugin.min.js
598 ms
greensock.js
628 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
730 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
632 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1001 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
826 ms
api.js
75 ms
adsbygoogle.js
14 ms
jquery.form.min.js
241 ms
scripts.js
298 ms
comment-reply.min.js
335 ms
main.min.js
1075 ms
wp-embed.min.js
398 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
forkme_right_white_ffffff.png
434 ms
phpipam_logo_small@2x.png
140 ms
recaptcha__en.js
416 ms
ca-pub-6139422165772589.js
407 ms
zrt_lookup.html
397 ms
show_ads_impl.js
275 ms
collect
297 ms
LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff
344 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
350 ms
icomoon.woff
288 ms
8c9q46CAcsp9TiRX9KLgZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
347 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
287 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.css
224 ms
loading.gif
141 ms
prev.gif
141 ms
next.gif
142 ms
blank.gif
142 ms
ads
585 ms
osd.js
55 ms
ads
387 ms
7551346079755906386
30 ms
abg.js
32 ms
m_js_controller.js
43 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
11 ms
x_button_blue2.png
43 ms
s
38 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
3 ms
css
54 ms
favicon
59 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
19 ms
img2.png
401 ms
ui
30 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
72 ms
phpipam.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
phpipam.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
phpipam.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phpipam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phpipam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phpipam.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PhpIPAM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: