Access phrame.eu. ▷ Architectural Visualization and ArchViz Studio ▷ Phrame

40

Performance

Renders faster than
59% of other websites
80

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 49% of websites
67

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
24% of websites
77

SEO

Google-friendlier than
36% of websites

First Response

654 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Phrame content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phrame.eu

▶ We are specialist in Architectural and Interior Design photorealistic 3D images. We manage rendering projects worldwide. Contact us for a free quotation

Visit phrame.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Phrame.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 654 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.9 s

1/100

10%

phrame.eu

654 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

343 ms

css

40 ms

hh4sb.js

87 ms

js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Phrame.eu, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Phrame.eu.

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Phrame.eu main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 407.3 kB

Original 503.3 kB
After minification 503.1 kB
After compression 96.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 407.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 38 B

Original 3.9 MB
After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phrame images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 398 B

Original 235.3 kB
After minification 235.3 kB
After compression 234.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phrame. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phrame.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phrame.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

phrame.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phrame. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

▷ Architectural Visualization and ArchViz Studio ▷ Phrame

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)