2.1 sec in total
58 ms
1.3 sec
731 ms
Click here to check amazing Phylmar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phylmar.com
We empower our communities of EHS and sustainability professionals by providing the resources they need to protect the health and safety of their stakeholders, promote a sustainable environment, and e...
Visit phylmar.comWe analyzed Phylmar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
phylmar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.134
80/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
58 ms
44 ms
116 ms
51 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Phylmar.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (496 ms) belongs to the original domain Phylmar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 225.8 kB (9%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Phylmar.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 167.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phylmar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phylmar.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (67%)
69
23
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phylmar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
phylmar.com
58 ms
www.phylmar.com
44 ms
www.phylmar.com
116 ms
gtm.js
51 ms
style.min.css
23 ms
styles.css
31 ms
email-subscribers-public.css
29 ms
responsive-tooltip.css
32 ms
ivory-search.min.css
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
32 ms
style.css
81 ms
rgs.css
110 ms
style.css
64 ms
magnific.css
43 ms
responsive.css
68 ms
select2.css
67 ms
ascend.css
78 ms
js_composer.min.css
111 ms
css
41 ms
jquery.min.js
109 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
108 ms
modernizr.js
138 ms
signup-form-widget.min.js
63 ms
style.css
106 ms
core.min.js
106 ms
menu.min.js
260 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
261 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
261 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
262 ms
dom-ready.min.js
421 ms
hooks.min.js
263 ms
i18n.min.js
262 ms
a11y.min.js
264 ms
autocomplete.min.js
265 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
265 ms
index.js
413 ms
index.js
412 ms
email-subscribers-public.js
414 ms
responsive-tooltip.js
413 ms
magnific.js
414 ms
superfish.js
414 ms
init.js
417 ms
touchswipe.min.js
399 ms
select2.min.js
396 ms
ivory-search.min.js
395 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
395 ms
js.cookie.js
391 ms
custom.js
390 ms
logo.png
251 ms
www.phylmar.com
250 ms
hero-image-desaturated.jpg
164 ms
icon-forums.png
250 ms
icon-academy.png
250 ms
icon-affiliates.png
250 ms
Phylmar-Client-Value-rev2-Graphic.jpg
251 ms
afirm-logo-transparency.png
255 ms
PRR-logo-registeredtrademark2.png
254 ms
consulting-sectional-pic.jpg
253 ms
PRR-banner.jpg
252 ms
lead.png
255 ms
online-1.png
252 ms
presentation.png
254 ms
univ.png
252 ms
toyota-1.gif
496 ms
varian-logo.png
253 ms
sempra-energy-logo.png
493 ms
spinner.gif
250 ms
white_ender_logo.png
492 ms
underscore-min.js
227 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
280 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
280 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
281 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
280 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo.woff
282 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff
281 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo.woff
358 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdo.woff
377 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQEl5fvg-O.woff
424 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQdl9fvg-O.woff
424 ms
icomoon.woff
280 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
280 ms
api.js
178 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
203 ms
recaptcha__en.js
25 ms
phylmar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
phylmar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
phylmar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phylmar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phylmar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phylmar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phylmar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: