Tools & Wizards About Us
physicstools.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

physicstools.org

Exploring The Impostance Of Homework Assignments For Learners | physicstools.org

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

145 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

269 ms

physicstools.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to physicstools.org homepage info - get ready to check Physicstools best content right away, or after learning these important things about physicstools.org

It is no secret that students sometimes need to spend more hours to complete their school assignments. Once a student and now a teacher, I consider several

Visit physicstools.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Physicstools.org page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

physicstools.org performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.044

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

physicstools.org

145 ms

physicstools.org

270 ms

www.physicstools.org

55 ms

www.physicstools.org

1583 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Physicstools.org, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Physicstoolsorg.satwp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Physicstools.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 197.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

997.5 kB

After Optimization

799.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Physicstools.org main page is 997.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 895.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 18.5 kB
  • After minification 17.7 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 176.4 kB

  • Original 895.3 kB
  • After minification 718.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Physicstools needs image optimization as it can save up to 176.4 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 62.7 kB
  • After minification 62.7 kB
  • After compression 59.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 20.9 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Physicstools.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (75%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Physicstools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

physicstools.org

physicstools.org

145 ms

physicstools.org

physicstools.org

270 ms

www.physicstools.org

www.physicstools.org

55 ms

www.physicstools.org

www.physicstools.org

1583 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

233 ms

css

css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

17 ms

theme-responsive.css

theme-responsive.css

22 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

25 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

39 ms

www.physicstools.org

www.physicstools.org

354 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

style.css

style.css

35 ms

style.css

style.css

35 ms

style_2.1.2.css

style_2.1.2.css

45 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

50 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

47 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

49 ms

custom.js

custom.js

56 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

59 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

61 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

62 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

64 ms

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

67 ms

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

70 ms

script.js

script.js

74 ms

script.js

script.js

76 ms

client.js

client.js

77 ms

script_2.1.2.js

script_2.1.2.js

76 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

86 ms

cropped-bg_main-10.jpg

cropped-bg_main-10.jpg

23 ms

cropped-logo-1.png

cropped-logo-1.png

25 ms

mobile_nav_right.png

mobile_nav_right.png

23 ms

31386-min.jpg

31386-min.jpg

25 ms

nav_right.png

nav_right.png

23 ms

cropped-bg_main-10.jpg

cropped-bg_main-10.jpg

374 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

17 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

19 ms

TK3-WkYFABsmjuBtFuvTIFRAPpWs-H08pmFC.ttf

TK3-WkYFABsmjuBtFuvTIFRAPpWs-H08pmFC.ttf

22 ms

TK3-WkYFABsmjuBtFuvTIFRAPpWsH3o8pmFC.ttf

TK3-WkYFABsmjuBtFuvTIFRAPpWsH3o8pmFC.ttf

26 ms

Accessibility Review

physicstools.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

physicstools.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

physicstools.org SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Physicstools.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Physicstools.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

physicstools.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Physicstools. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: