3.3 sec in total
194 ms
2.6 sec
458 ms
Visit pianofight.com now to see the best up-to-date Piano Fight content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pianofight.com
Visit pianofight.comWe analyzed Pianofight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pianofight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
194 ms
70 ms
141 ms
132 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Pianofight.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Biz152.inmotionhosting.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (830 ms) belongs to the original domain Pianofight.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (29%)
4.0 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Pianofight.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Piano Fight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 767.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 767.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 329.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pianofight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 329.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (73%)
55
15
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Piano Fight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.pianofight.com
194 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
styles.css
141 ms
rgs.css
132 ms
font-awesome.min.css
138 ms
steadysets.css
135 ms
linecon.css
134 ms
style.css
210 ms
responsive.css
204 ms
jquery.js
275 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
198 ms
modernizr.js
198 ms
js_composer_front.css
199 ms
core.min.js
272 ms
widget.min.js
338 ms
position.min.js
338 ms
menu.min.js
271 ms
autocomplete.min.js
375 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
406 ms
jquery.form.min.js
405 ms
scripts.js
405 ms
superfish.js
404 ms
easing.js
404 ms
respond.js
403 ms
swipe.min.js
462 ms
nicescroll.js
516 ms
sticky.js
463 ms
prettyPhoto.js
464 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
460 ms
isotope.min.js
462 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
526 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
594 ms
appear.js
529 ms
init.js
676 ms
blog-masonry.js
525 ms
nectar-slider.js
651 ms
comment-reply.min.js
596 ms
nectar-love.js
532 ms
bj-lazy-load.min.js
472 ms
wp-embed.min.js
540 ms
js_composer_front.js
540 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
158 ms
collect
189 ms
fbevents.js
97 ms
pflogo.png
214 ms
pflogo-retina.png
259 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
286 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
292 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
532 ms
icomoon.woff
531 ms
159 ms
nye-blur.jpg
451 ms
grid.png
69 ms
shortlived-slider.png
830 ms
brunch.jpg
448 ms
merch-slider.jpg
194 ms
nectar-loading.gif
71 ms
diagonal_line.png
134 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
133 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
266 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
302 ms
pianofight.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pianofight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pianofight.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pianofight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pianofight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pianofight.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Piano Fight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: