Tools & Wizards About Us
pianotiles.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

pianotiles.org

pianotiles.org

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

761 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

80 ms

pianotiles.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pianotiles content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pianotiles.org

Expired Registration Recovery Policy

Visit pianotiles.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Pianotiles.org page load time and found that the first response time was 761 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pianotiles.org performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pianotiles.org

761 ms

screen.css

207 ms

style_eRRP.css

206 ms

jquery.min.js

12 ms

fade-plugin.js

220 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Pianotiles.org, 17% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (761 ms) belongs to the original domain Pianotiles.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26.5 kB (22%)

Content Size

118.9 kB

After Optimization

92.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pianotiles.org main page is 118.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 72.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 36% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 427 B

  • Original 17.1 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pianotiles images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 72.8 kB
  • After minification 66.7 kB
  • After compression 58.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 3.5 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 822 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pianotiles.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pianotiles. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pianotiles.org

pianotiles.org

761 ms

screen.css

screen.css

207 ms

style_eRRP.css

style_eRRP.css

206 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

12 ms

fade-plugin.js

fade-plugin.js

220 ms

feed.js

feed.js

477 ms

banner_ads.js

banner_ads.js

115 ms

js

js

54 ms

separator.gif

separator.gif

112 ms

contentbox_bg.gif

contentbox_bg.gif

105 ms

contentbox_top.gif

contentbox_top.gif

105 ms

contentbox_bottom.gif

contentbox_bottom.gif

104 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

25 ms

flag_us.png

flag_us.png

113 ms

flag_de.png

flag_de.png

105 ms

flag_es.png

flag_es.png

105 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

collect

collect

7 ms

Accessibility Review

pianotiles.org accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pianotiles.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pianotiles.org SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pianotiles.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pianotiles.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pianotiles.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pianotiles. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: