958 ms in total
94 ms
729 ms
135 ms
Click here to check amazing Pichicago content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pichicago.com
Blue 22 provides a wide range of services including background checks, asset searches, criminal and civil litigation inquiries, and more.
Visit pichicago.comWe analyzed Pichicago.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 864 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
pichicago.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
39/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value550 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
94 ms
97 ms
26 ms
40 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Pichicago.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (305 ms) belongs to the original domain Pichicago.com.
Page size can be reduced by 52.7 kB (20%)
264.1 kB
211.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Pichicago.com main page is 264.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 170.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.
Potential reduce by 71 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pichicago.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (83%)
36
6
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pichicago. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pichicago.com
94 ms
pichicago.com
97 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
style.min.css
40 ms
leaflet.css
48 ms
mappress.css
68 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
66 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
69 ms
style.css
85 ms
style.css
72 ms
grid.css
73 ms
icons.css
97 ms
js_composer.min.css
135 ms
animations.css
95 ms
grid_responsive.css
99 ms
css
41 ms
jetpack.css
121 ms
jquery.min.js
121 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
121 ms
nfpluginsettings.js
120 ms
libs.min.js
174 ms
common.js
131 ms
jquery.smoothscroll.js
128 ms
background-style.css
131 ms
animate.css
171 ms
style.css
172 ms
e-202434.js
33 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
246 ms
ultimate_bg.js
246 ms
jparallax.js
245 ms
jquery.vhparallax.js
247 ms
jquery.appear.js
246 ms
custom.js
305 ms
collect
16 ms
js
51 ms
Blue_22_Circle_Logo_Tranparent.png
71 ms
brand-co.png
71 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
99 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
114 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
124 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
114 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
125 ms
icomoon.svg
161 ms
icomoon.woff
203 ms
pichicago.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pichicago.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pichicago.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pichicago.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pichicago.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pichicago.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pichicago. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: