Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

picturetom.com

Wheels & Waves — Independent Fine Art Photography

Page Load Speed

9.7 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

picturetom.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Picturetom content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about picturetom.com

Wheels and Waves 2018 - Exceptional days in the Basque Country by picturetom, biker, artist and photographer.

Visit picturetom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Picturetom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

picturetom.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,680 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.159

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.picturetom.com

1493 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

2172 ms

colorbox.css

218 ms

style.css

2164 ms

gspm-styles.css

2007 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Picturetom.com, 20% (19 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Picturetom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 744.7 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

828.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Picturetom.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 554.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 65.9 kB
  • After minification 65.3 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 554.0 kB
  • After minification 541.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Picturetom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 307.5 kB

  • Original 475.6 kB
  • After minification 470.4 kB
  • After compression 168.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 369.2 kB

  • Original 478.1 kB
  • After minification 461.2 kB
  • After compression 108.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Picturetom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 369.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (67%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Picturetom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

picturetom.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

picturetom.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

picturetom.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Picturetom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Picturetom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Picturetom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: