Tools & Wizards About Us
picturetrail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

picturetrail.com

The Picturetrail Team Is Now CatalystApps

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

236 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

104 ms

picturetrail.com screenshot

About Website

Visit picturetrail.com now to see the best up-to-date Picturetrail content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about picturetrail.com

Picturetrail Is Now Catalyst Apps

Visit picturetrail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Picturetrail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

picturetrail.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

picturetrail.com

236 ms

stylesheet.css

78 ms

ie_flash_fix_homepage.js

146 ms

quant.js

5 ms

urchin.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Picturetrail.com, 52% (12 requests) were made to Pics.picturetrail.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (675 ms) relates to the external source Pic80.picturetrail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 283.4 kB (57%)

Content Size

500.2 kB

After Optimization

216.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Picturetrail.com main page is 500.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 288.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 15.1 kB

  • Original 19.6 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 135.4 kB
  • After minification 122.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Picturetrail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 204.1 kB

  • Original 288.9 kB
  • After minification 287.4 kB
  • After compression 84.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 51.3 kB

  • Original 56.4 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Picturetrail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (36%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Picturetrail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

picturetrail.com

picturetrail.com

236 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

78 ms

ie_flash_fix_homepage.js

ie_flash_fix_homepage.js

146 ms

quant.js

quant.js

5 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

7 ms

header_bkg.jpg

header_bkg.jpg

356 ms

408508879.jpg

408508879.jpg

675 ms

gallery.fcgi

gallery.fcgi

109 ms

counter.fcgi

counter.fcgi

222 ms

pixel;r=467695058;a=p-ebY-QG3WmdZWM;fpan=1;fpa=P0-140093625-1456747904338;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456747904338;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpicturetrail.com%2F;ogl=

pixel;r=467695058;a=p-ebY-QG3WmdZWM;fpan=1;fpa=P0-140093625-1456747904338;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456747904338;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpicturetrail.com%2F;ogl=

7 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

4 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

331 ms

tab_slideshows_lt.jpg

tab_slideshows_lt.jpg

331 ms

tab_photosharing_lt.jpg

tab_photosharing_lt.jpg

330 ms

tab_clubs_lt.jpg

tab_clubs_lt.jpg

330 ms

button-signup.gif

button-signup.gif

329 ms

button-login.gif

button-login.gif

396 ms

button-go.jpg

button-go.jpg

398 ms

button-flicksbutton.gif

button-flicksbutton.gif

395 ms

sitelogos.gif

sitelogos.gif

397 ms

bluevline.gif

bluevline.gif

397 ms

button-learnmore.gif

button-learnmore.gif

397 ms

t-993500.jpg

t-993500.jpg

221 ms

Accessibility Review

picturetrail.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

picturetrail.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

picturetrail.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Picturetrail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Picturetrail.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

picturetrail.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Picturetrail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: