Tools & Wizards About Us
pidpid.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

pidpid.com

Pid, picture in design, agency restoran, desain menu, food photographer jakarta, fotografer makanan, desain logo

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

350 ms

pidpid.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pidpid.com now to see the best up-to-date Pid content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pidpid.com

AGENCY RESTORAN, DESAIN MENU, FOOD PHOTOGRAPHY, CETAK MENU, CETAK BANNER, FOOD PHOTOGRAPHER JAKARTA, FOOD PHOTOGRAPHY JAKARTA, JASA FOTOGRAFI, FOTOGRAFER MAKANAN, DESIGN MENU BOOK, DESAIN BUKU MENU, C...

Visit pidpid.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pidpid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pidpid.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,650 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pidpid.com

1418 ms

style.css

145 ms

custom-style.css

103 ms

sfpw-style.css

74 ms

pagenavi-css.css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Pidpid.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Pidpid.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 314.7 kB (41%)

Content Size

774.0 kB

After Optimization

459.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pidpid.com main page is 774.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 76.9 kB

  • Original 91.7 kB
  • After minification 79.4 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 342.6 kB
  • After minification 337.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pid images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 144.5 kB

  • Original 231.6 kB
  • After minification 229.7 kB
  • After compression 87.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.5 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 87.9 kB

  • Original 108.1 kB
  • After minification 97.9 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pidpid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (59%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pid . We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pidpid.com

pidpid.com

1418 ms

style.css

style.css

145 ms

custom-style.css

custom-style.css

103 ms

sfpw-style.css

sfpw-style.css

74 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

76 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

170 ms

style.css

style.css

169 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

57 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

254 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

209 ms

swift-js-functions.js

swift-js-functions.js

236 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

120 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

130 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

268 ms

photon.js

photon.js

131 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

9 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

94 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

301 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

323 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

4 ms

ga.js

ga.js

38 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

339 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-8.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-8.jpg

601 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-21.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-21.jpg

601 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-5.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-5.jpg

592 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

600 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

302 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-12.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-12.jpg

599 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-7.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-7.jpg

274 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-10.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-10.jpg

600 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-13.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-13.jpg

602 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-9.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-9.jpg

306 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-31.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-31.jpg

583 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-6.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-6.jpg

261 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-4.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-4.jpg

598 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-1.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-1.jpg

253 ms

custom-style.css

custom-style.css

304 ms

PID-web-header-new-1.jpg

PID-web-header-new-1.jpg

664 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

588 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

589 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

597 ms

feed.png

feed.png

595 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

28 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

27 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

45 ms

search.png

search.png

457 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

79 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

30 ms

services.css

services.css

295 ms

timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js

timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js

325 ms

g.gif

g.gif

4 ms

syndication

syndication

87 ms

411684776500682752

411684776500682752

283 ms

Accessibility Review

pidpid.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

pidpid.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pidpid.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pidpid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Pidpid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pidpid.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pid . This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: