Tools & Wizards About Us
pidpid.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

pidpid.com

Pid, picture in design, agency restoran, desain menu, food photographer jakarta, fotografer makanan, desain logo

Page Load Speed

23.4 sec in total

First Response

8.3 sec

Resources Loaded

13.1 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

pidpid.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pidpid.com now to see the best up-to-date Pid content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pidpid.com

AGENCY RESTORAN, DESAIN MENU, FOOD PHOTOGRAPHY, CETAK MENU, CETAK BANNER, FOOD PHOTOGRAPHER JAKARTA, FOOD PHOTOGRAPHY JAKARTA, JASA FOTOGRAFI, FOTOGRAFER MAKANAN, DESIGN MENU BOOK, DESAIN BUKU MENU, C...

Visit pidpid.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pidpid.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8.3 sec and then it took 15.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pidpid.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pidpid.com

8306 ms

analytics.js

41 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

512 ms

sfpw-style.css

556 ms

io-grid.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Pidpid.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pidpid.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 358.0 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

816.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pidpid.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 699.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 92.1 kB
  • After minification 77.8 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 699.0 kB
  • After minification 685.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pid images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 136.0 kB

  • Original 225.9 kB
  • After minification 220.4 kB
  • After compression 89.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 130.8 kB

  • Original 157.7 kB
  • After minification 135.7 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pidpid.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (45%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pid . We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pidpid.com

pidpid.com

8306 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

41 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

512 ms

sfpw-style.css

sfpw-style.css

556 ms

io-grid.css

io-grid.css

66 ms

style.css

style.css

1175 ms

custom-styles.css

custom-styles.css

1294 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1007 ms

style.css

style.css

765 ms

whatsappshare.css

whatsappshare.css

834 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1251 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1019 ms

whatsappshare.js

whatsappshare.js

1107 ms

PID-web-header-new-1.jpg

PID-web-header-new-1.jpg

1978 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

61 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-8.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-8.jpg

1245 ms

pidpid.com

pidpid.com

5129 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-21.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-21.jpg

1483 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-5.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-5.jpg

1300 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

1342 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-11.jpg

1500 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-12.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-12.jpg

1621 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-9.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-9.jpg

1983 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-6.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-6.jpg

1790 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-4.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-4.jpg

1755 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-7.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-7.jpg

1942 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-13.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-13.jpg

2041 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1691 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1787 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1942 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

1986 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

1947 ms

swift-js.js

swift-js.js

2067 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2103 ms

feature-post-NEW-edit-10.jpg

feature-post-NEW-edit-10.jpg

2262 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

2200 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

2305 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

2410 ms

feed.png

feed.png

2422 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1700 ms

43850580c7e0bc709d7e5991294e1fee

43850580c7e0bc709d7e5991294e1fee

11 ms

43850580c7e0bc709d7e5991294e1fee

43850580c7e0bc709d7e5991294e1fee

12 ms

Accessibility Review

pidpid.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

pidpid.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pidpid.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pidpid.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Pidpid.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pidpid.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pid . Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: