Tools & Wizards About Us
pielink.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

pielink.net

PIELink – A practice exchange for psychologically informed environments.

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

pielink.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pielink.net homepage info - get ready to check PIELink best content right away, or after learning these important things about pielink.net

  Please note: this site is optimised for the big screen - desktops and tablets - and is less readable on mobile phones. Otherwise......... Welcome to the PIELink This website is the online home of a ...

Visit pielink.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pielink.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pielink.net performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,950 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pielink.net

1291 ms

font-awesome.min.css

27 ms

css

32 ms

wordpress.min.css

35 ms

buddypress-main.min.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Pielink.net, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pielink.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 419.6 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

691.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pielink.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 475.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 409.1 kB

  • Original 475.4 kB
  • After minification 471.1 kB
  • After compression 66.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 409.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 27.2 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIELink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 353.0 kB
  • After minification 352.9 kB
  • After compression 348.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 255.5 kB
  • After minification 255.5 kB
  • After compression 251.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pielink.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (90%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIELink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pielink.net

pielink.net

1291 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

27 ms

css

css

32 ms

wordpress.min.css

wordpress.min.css

35 ms

buddypress-main.min.css

buddypress-main.min.css

39 ms

bbpress-main.min.css

bbpress-main.min.css

33 ms

plugins.min.css

plugins.min.css

37 ms

adminbar-mobile.min.css

adminbar-mobile.min.css

36 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

53 ms

adminbar-desktop-floating.min.css

adminbar-desktop-floating.min.css

43 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

54 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

46 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

41 ms

views-frontend.css

views-frontend.css

90 ms

style.css

style.css

93 ms

animations.css

animations.css

98 ms

style.basic.css

style.basic.css

96 ms

style.css

style.css

90 ms

icons.css

icons.css

205 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

177 ms

select2.css

select2.css

177 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

191 ms

custom.css

custom.css

192 ms

toolset-common-es-frontend.js

toolset-common-es-frontend.js

201 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

199 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

201 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

203 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

231 ms

buddyboss.min.js

buddyboss.min.js

232 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

232 ms

script.js

script.js

231 ms

jquery.ajaxsearchpro-noui.min.js

jquery.ajaxsearchpro-noui.min.js

260 ms

bpas-loadmore.js

bpas-loadmore.js

251 ms

front-widget.js

front-widget.js

257 ms

apply-chosen.js

apply-chosen.js

260 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

35 ms

css

css

15 ms

pie-link-new-logo.png

pie-link-new-logo.png

48 ms

6-wt1P_AYBM

6-wt1P_AYBM

132 ms

icons.css

icons.css

68 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

72 ms

admin-bar.min.js

admin-bar.min.js

78 ms

idangerous.swiper.min.js

idangerous.swiper.min.js

93 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

67 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

67 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

95 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

93 ms

heartbeat.min.js

heartbeat.min.js

94 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

94 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

94 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

109 ms

suggest.min.js

suggest.min.js

114 ms

main.js

main.js

119 ms

date.js

date.js

121 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

120 ms

hoverintent-js.min.js

hoverintent-js.min.js

93 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

26 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

32 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

45 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

12 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

46 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

45 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

59 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

58 ms

forkawesome-webfont.woff

forkawesome-webfont.woff

277 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

45 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

62 ms

base.js

base.js

88 ms

id

id

37 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

33 ms

6-wt1P_AYBM

6-wt1P_AYBM

175 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

117 ms

yHiuAayzh7ZXFXvbIOrPkyv85wwmgA2suXoAI6Ktxww.js

yHiuAayzh7ZXFXvbIOrPkyv85wwmgA2suXoAI6Ktxww.js

87 ms

embed.js

embed.js

18 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

23 ms

id

id

30 ms

Accessibility Review

pielink.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pielink.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pielink.net SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pielink.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pielink.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pielink.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PIELink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: