Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

piercingline.com

PIERCINGLINE » Piercings, Schmuck & Zubehör online bestellen

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

287 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

224 ms

piercingline.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing PIERCINGLINE content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about piercingline.com

Erlebe die große Auswahl von PIERCINGLINE » Hochwertige Qualität ✓ Schneller Versand ✓ Neueste Trends » Jetzt entdecken!

Visit piercingline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Piercingline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 287 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

piercingline.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,680 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

piercingline.com

287 ms

www.piercingline.com

552 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

326 ms

jquery.inputlabel.js

210 ms

jquery-ui.js

673 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Piercingline.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Piercingline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (54%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

928.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Piercingline.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 85.7 kB

  • Original 115.3 kB
  • After minification 101.0 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 581.3 kB
  • After minification 557.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIERCINGLINE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 909.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 324.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 909.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 94.1 kB
  • After minification 70.9 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Piercingline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (58%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIERCINGLINE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

piercingline.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

piercingline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

piercingline.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Piercingline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Piercingline.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PIERCINGLINE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: