Tools & Wizards About Us
piitl.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

piitl.in

German,French,Italian,Spanish,Turkish,Russian,Korean,Japanese,Chinese,Arabic,Thai,Danish,Polish,Finnish,Dutch,Portuguese Languages Institute:PIITL Luc...

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

178 ms

piitl.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing PIITL content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about piitl.in

The only organization that is committed to give education of foreign languages such as French, German, Spanish, Italian, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian, Portuguese, Polish, Dutch, Finnish,...

Visit piitl.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Piitl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

piitl.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value34.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value44.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value54.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.292

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value41.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

piitl.in

187 ms

piitl.in

344 ms

analytics.js

23 ms

js

61 ms

bootstrap.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Piitl.in, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Piitl.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Piitl.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 15.5 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 120.2 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIITL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 114.5 kB
  • After minification 114.5 kB
  • After compression 75.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 35.9 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Piitl.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (33%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIITL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

piitl.in

piitl.in

187 ms

piitl.in

piitl.in

344 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

js

js

61 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

241 ms

bootstrap-responsive1.css

bootstrap-responsive1.css

201 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

206 ms

ticker-style.css

ticker-style.css

205 ms

style.css

style.css

210 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

218 ms

social.png

social.png

532 ms

logo.png

logo.png

624 ms

lap.gif

lap.gif

573 ms

fb.png

fb.png

368 ms

gogle.png

gogle.png

373 ms

rss.png

rss.png

384 ms

twi.png

twi.png

733 ms

ban1.jpg

ban1.jpg

977 ms

ban2.jpg

ban2.jpg

978 ms

ban3.jpg

ban3.jpg

944 ms

ban4.jpg

ban4.jpg

845 ms

ban5.jpg

ban5.jpg

834 ms

scan.jpg

scan.jpg

975 ms

tuba.jpg

tuba.jpg

922 ms

talha.jpg

talha.jpg

919 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1036 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

1036 ms

jquery.ticker.js

jquery.ticker.js

1087 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

1132 ms

jquery.superfish.js

jquery.superfish.js

1122 ms

jquery.selectbox.min.js

jquery.selectbox.min.js

1121 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

1119 ms

script.js

script.js

1125 ms

con-info1.png

con-info1.png

1473 ms

con-info2.png

con-info2.png

1333 ms

con-info4.png

con-info4.png

1494 ms

back-to-top.png

back-to-top.png

1333 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

47 ms

body-background.jpg

body-background.jpg

1282 ms

bg1.png

bg1.png

1089 ms

bullets1.png

bullets1.png

366 ms

bullets.png

bullets.png

369 ms

prev-slide.png

prev-slide.png

433 ms

next-slide.png

next-slide.png

431 ms

recentpost.png

recentpost.png

436 ms

prev-recent.png

prev-recent.png

431 ms

next-recent.png

next-recent.png

517 ms

Accessibility Review

piitl.in accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

piitl.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

piitl.in SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Piitl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Piitl.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

piitl.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PIITL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: