5 sec in total
979 ms
3.7 sec
311 ms
Visit pijama.it now to see the best up-to-date Pijama content for Italy and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pijama.it
Custodie e zaini in tessuto e neoprene fatti a Milano dal 2006. Scopri anche le nostre borse, i nostri accessori e tutta la collezione firmata Pijama
Visit pijama.itWe analyzed Pijama.it page load time and found that the first response time was 979 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
pijama.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.7 s
0/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.109
87/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
979 ms
98 ms
379 ms
283 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Pijama.it, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (979 ms) belongs to the original domain Pijama.it.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (58%)
3.0 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Pijama.it main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pijama images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 405.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pijama.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 405.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (50%)
101
51
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pijama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.pijama.it
979 ms
styles.css3.php
98 ms
3080371e4349da20c931b2c1113f9526.css
379 ms
prototype.js
283 ms
ccard.js
186 ms
validation.js
189 ms
builder.js
190 ms
effects.js
192 ms
dragdrop.js
278 ms
controls.js
283 ms
slider.js
284 ms
js.js
288 ms
form.js
368 ms
menu.js
372 ms
translate.js
415 ms
cookies.js
416 ms
ma.jq.slide.js
483 ms
ma.flexslider.js
461 ms
bootstrap.min.js
464 ms
jquery-ui.js
658 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
469 ms
ma.mobilemenu.js
470 ms
ma.menu.effect.js
551 ms
backtotop.js
555 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
563 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
563 ms
amlanding.js
576 ms
ajax_cart_super.js
643 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
648 ms
product.js
693 ms
prototype_loader.js
691 ms
jstorage.min.js
694 ms
globalObjects.js
734 ms
customOptions.js
739 ms
downloadable.js
746 ms
quickView.js
748 ms
settings.css
748 ms
793 ms
tabs.js
652 ms
owl.carousel.js
656 ms
bundle.js
660 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
759 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
686 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
logo.png
94 ms
m13_5.png
95 ms
pad_4.png
95 ms
ipd_4.png
135 ms
z13_4.png
238 ms
zar_2.png
239 ms
pom_6.png
239 ms
sug_7.png
240 ms
toh_4.png
241 ms
duf_10.png
243 ms
sat_6.png
275 ms
bea_6.png
276 ms
yog_6.png
278 ms
bum_6.png
283 ms
bag_11.png
284 ms
han.png
315 ms
sac.png
366 ms
pac_4.png
367 ms
sli_4.png
369 ms
mas_4.png
376 ms
btc_6.png
377 ms
sps_6.png
409 ms
pas_6.png
458 ms
pla_6.png
459 ms
coa_2.png
460 ms
dummy.png
541 ms
about.jpg
844 ms
collabo.jpg
883 ms
blog_1.jpg
560 ms
instagram.jpg
731 ms
z13igli_1.jpg
562 ms
z13iges_1.jpg
564 ms
zariges_1.jpg
638 ms
collect
13 ms
vagrounded-light-webfont.woff
704 ms
collect
80 ms
vagrounded-bold-webfont.woff
682 ms
iphigli_1.jpg
656 ms
z13igsr_1.jpg
736 ms
zarigsr_1.jpg
723 ms
m13wx06_1.jpg
709 ms
m13wx08_1.jpg
719 ms
zarwx07_1.jpg
684 ms
pabwx06_1.jpg
687 ms
pabwx08_1.jpg
686 ms
m13wx07_1.jpg
702 ms
zarwx06_1.jpg
703 ms
zarwx08_1.jpg
738 ms
pabwx07_1.jpg
737 ms
iphdnbk_1.jpg
738 ms
logo_payoff.png
737 ms
arrow-left.png
754 ms
arrow-right.png
754 ms
ajax-loader.gif
762 ms
bg.png
738 ms
coloredbg.png
739 ms
large_left.png
740 ms
large_right.png
754 ms
transparent.png
754 ms
home700-pareo.jpg
952 ms
c6185e1a000f7ea601418cacc9ac851a.css
97 ms
pijama.it accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pijama.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
pijama.it SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pijama.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Pijama.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pijama.it
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pijama. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: