4.7 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.3 sec
115 ms
Visit pijnappel.de now to see the best up-to-date Pijnappel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pijnappel.de
Visit pijnappel.deWe analyzed Pijnappel.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pijnappel.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value2.7 s
84/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
1272 ms
308 ms
311 ms
27 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Pijnappel.de, 22% (20 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pijnappel.de.
Page size can be reduced by 982.7 kB (61%)
1.6 MB
633.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Pijnappel.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pijnappel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 828.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 828.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pijnappel.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (63%)
79
29
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pijnappel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pijnappel.de
1272 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
308 ms
layerslider.css
311 ms
css
27 ms
styles.css
210 ms
style.css
521 ms
responsive.css
213 ms
isotope.css
211 ms
magnific-popup.css
314 ms
flexslider.css
318 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
422 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.css
409 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.css
408 ms
yellow.css
419 ms
css
33 ms
greensock.js
713 ms
jquery.js
832 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
535 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
749 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
636 ms
js
39 ms
jquery.form.min.js
621 ms
scripts.js
638 ms
superfish.js
732 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
746 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
968 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
812 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
966 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
1057 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
967 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.min.js
963 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
964 ms
jquery.idTabs.min.js
965 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
964 ms
audio.js
1021 ms
widgets.js
1029 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.js
1036 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
1262 ms
jquery.animate-enhanced.min.js
1065 ms
gmap3.js
1026 ms
custom.js
1038 ms
wp-embed.min.js
945 ms
white_loader.gif
280 ms
plus.png
282 ms
Timo.jpg
561 ms
mysig.png
559 ms
back-resume.png
560 ms
next-resume.png
559 ms
link_post.png
560 ms
dribbble_b.png
560 ms
linkedin_b.png
560 ms
xing_b.png
560 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
12 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
30 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
31 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
31 ms
common.js
21 ms
map.js
34 ms
util.js
78 ms
marker.js
33 ms
ajax-loader.gif
123 ms
onion.js
26 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
53 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
92 ms
stats.js
37 ms
controls.js
31 ms
transparent.png
28 ms
css
17 ms
google4.png
45 ms
marker.png
132 ms
mapcnt6.png
65 ms
sv5.png
60 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
38 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
37 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
38 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
38 ms
vt
53 ms
vt
73 ms
vt
49 ms
vt
45 ms
vt
79 ms
vt
73 ms
vt
68 ms
vt
92 ms
vt
90 ms
vt
123 ms
google_white5.png
26 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
128 ms
pijnappel.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
pijnappel.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pijnappel.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pijnappel.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Pijnappel.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pijnappel.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pijnappel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: