Tools & Wizards About Us
piketec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

piketec.com

PikeTec | Testing embedded software with TPT | MiL, SiL, HiL, automotive

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

630 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

393 ms

piketec.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pike Tec content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about piketec.com

PikeTec develops user-friendly tools for testing and verifying safety-related embedded systems in MiL,SiL, HiL, vehicle. PikeTec also offers test engineering.

Visit piketec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Piketec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 630 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

piketec.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.381

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

piketec.com

630 ms

jquery.min.js

245 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

377 ms

plugins.js

376 ms

layers.framework.js

390 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Piketec.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Js-eu1.hs-scripts.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.matomo.cloud. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Piketec.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 267.3 kB (36%)

Content Size

741.2 kB

After Optimization

473.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Piketec.com main page is 741.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 396.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 260.1 kB

  • Original 295.0 kB
  • After minification 272.2 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 260.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 396.6 kB
  • After minification 396.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pike Tec images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 49.7 kB
  • After compression 42.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (82%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pike Tec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

piketec.com

piketec.com

630 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

245 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

377 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

376 ms

layers.framework.js

layers.framework.js

390 ms

layers-pro.js

layers-pro.js

376 ms

25231098.js

25231098.js

467 ms

25231098.js

25231098.js

472 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

376 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

398 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

651 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

514 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

543 ms

vimeo.min.js

vimeo.min.js

551 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

549 ms

borlabs-cookie.min.js

borlabs-cookie.min.js

643 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

667 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

685 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

802 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

709 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

771 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

772 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

809 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

836 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

852 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

899 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

904 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

945 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

964 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

984 ms

container_XlVfvVVx.js

container_XlVfvVVx.js

449 ms

2222f32ddba6403b082eda2fb27dbace.css

2222f32ddba6403b082eda2fb27dbace.css

1300 ms

layers-icons.ttf

layers-icons.ttf

729 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

391 ms

banner.js

banner.js

432 ms

25231098.js

25231098.js

441 ms

fb.js

fb.js

420 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

456 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

129 ms

PikeTec-web-hero-2048x560-v2_FINAL.jpg

PikeTec-web-hero-2048x560-v2_FINAL.jpg

427 ms

Spices.jpg

Spices.jpg

337 ms

SteeringWheel_PikeTec.jpg

SteeringWheel_PikeTec.jpg

261 ms

comments-icon-1.jpg

comments-icon-1.jpg

175 ms

raleway-v14-latin-500.woff

raleway-v14-latin-500.woff

267 ms

raleway-v14-latin-regular.woff

raleway-v14-latin-regular.woff

251 ms

raleway-v14-latin-300.woff

raleway-v14-latin-300.woff

144 ms

raleway-v14-latin-200.woff

raleway-v14-latin-200.woff

160 ms

raleway-v14-latin-100.woff

raleway-v14-latin-100.woff

266 ms

raleway-v14-latin-600.woff

raleway-v14-latin-600.woff

314 ms

raleway-v14-latin-700.woff

raleway-v14-latin-700.woff

312 ms

raleway-v14-latin-800.woff

raleway-v14-latin-800.woff

313 ms

raleway-v14-latin-900.woff

raleway-v14-latin-900.woff

479 ms

roboto-v20-latin-700.woff

roboto-v20-latin-700.woff

406 ms

roboto-v20-latin-900.woff

roboto-v20-latin-900.woff

528 ms

roboto-v20-latin-500.woff

roboto-v20-latin-500.woff

436 ms

roboto-v20-latin-regular.woff

roboto-v20-latin-regular.woff

437 ms

roboto-v20-latin-300.woff

roboto-v20-latin-300.woff

561 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

798 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

679 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

812 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

754 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

4 ms

Accessibility Review

piketec.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

piketec.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

piketec.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Piketec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Piketec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

piketec.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pike Tec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: