10.5 sec in total
3.2 sec
6.7 sec
621 ms
Click here to check amazing PILF content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pilf.in
Pune International Literary Festival 2023. Do Register To Be Part Of This Awesome Event!
Visit pilf.inWe analyzed Pilf.in page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
pilf.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
19/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value200 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.504
16/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
3203 ms
607 ms
811 ms
412 ms
426 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Pilf.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Pilf.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (37%)
3.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pilf.in main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PILF images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 383.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 383.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 613.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pilf.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 613.5 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (41%)
68
40
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PILF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pilf.in
3203 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
607 ms
stylesheet.css
811 ms
system-message.css
412 ms
styles.css
426 ms
settings.css
855 ms
styles.css
617 ms
logos.css
639 ms
style.css
997 ms
css
26 ms
font-awesome.css
1029 ms
social_icons_widget.css
853 ms
style.css
1006 ms
themes.css
1065 ms
default.min.css
1063 ms
js_composer.css
2356 ms
jquery.js
1596 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1206 ms
jquery.Tooltip.js
1235 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1488 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1709 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1813 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
2058 ms
logos.js
1703 ms
css
14 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1226 ms
scripts.js
1196 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1196 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
1273 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1292 ms
js_composer_front.js
1621 ms
bg-1.jpg
217 ms
logo.png
636 ms
pilf-1.jpg
641 ms
pilf-2.jpg
410 ms
pilf-3.jpg
431 ms
pilf-4.jpg
608 ms
pilf-5.jpg
392 ms
pilf-6.jpg
602 ms
pilf-7.jpg
828 ms
pilf-8.jpg
859 ms
pilf-9.jpg
814 ms
pilf-10.jpg
1031 ms
pilf-11.jpg
1003 ms
pilf-12.jpg
1070 ms
pilf-13.jpg
1023 ms
pilf-14.jpg
1032 ms
pilf-15.jpg
1281 ms
pilf-17.jpg
1393 ms
pilf-18.jpg
1219 ms
pilf-19.jpg
1228 ms
pilf-20.jpg
1433 ms
jaicob.jpg
1274 ms
ramee_gandhi.jpg
1426 ms
ipop.jpg
1436 ms
radio_one.jpg
1490 ms
om_books.jpg
1498 ms
macci.jpg
1592 ms
roli_groups.jpg
1628 ms
indira.jpg
1636 ms
bdb.jpg
1648 ms
fingerprint.jpg
1704 ms
crossword.jpg
1707 ms
saucer.jpg
1794 ms
Akshara.jpg
1833 ms
british_counsil.jpg
1837 ms
goeth_institute.jpg
1853 ms
facebook.jpg
1751 ms
twitter.jpg
1547 ms
pilf.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
pilf.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pilf.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pilf.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pilf.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pilf.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PILF. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: