Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

pilkington.com

Pilkington - First in Glass

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

959 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

206 ms

pilkington.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pilkington.com now to see the best up-to-date Pilkington content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pilkington.com

Pilkington

Visit pilkington.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pilkington.com page load time and found that the first response time was 959 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pilkington.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pilkington.com

959 ms

www.pilkington.com

460 ms

windows.js

81 ms

clientsideconstants.js

165 ms

swapimage.js

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Pilkington.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) belongs to the original domain Pilkington.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 274.1 kB (41%)

Content Size

660.5 kB

After Optimization

386.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Pilkington.com main page is 660.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 286.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 21.5 kB

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 286.9 kB
  • After minification 278.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pilkington images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 184.4 kB

  • Original 276.4 kB
  • After minification 200.0 kB
  • After compression 92.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 59.9 kB

  • Original 70.4 kB
  • After minification 50.2 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pilkington.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (60%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pilkington. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pilkington.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pilkington.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pilkington.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pilkington.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pilkington.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pilkington. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: