Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

pillartech.com

Induction Sealers, Surface Treatment Solutions | Pillar Technologies

Page Load Speed

906 ms in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

783 ms

Page Rendered

70 ms

pillartech.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pillartech.com homepage info - get ready to check Pillar Tech best content right away, or after learning these important things about pillartech.com

Discover high-quality induction sealers & surface treatment options for fast-paced packaging. Our handheld sealers provide consistent, accurate sealing.

Visit pillartech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pillartech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 853 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pillartech.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pillartech.com

53 ms

www.pillartech.com

164 ms

default.css

120 ms

admin.css

48 ms

application.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Pillartech.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (296 ms) belongs to the original domain Pillartech.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (73%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Pillartech.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 174.0 kB

  • Original 205.7 kB
  • After minification 146.3 kB
  • After compression 31.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 59.5 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 678.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pillar Tech needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 71% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 368.7 kB

  • Original 582.5 kB
  • After minification 489.7 kB
  • After compression 213.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 368.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 434.9 kB

  • Original 512.8 kB
  • After minification 461.3 kB
  • After compression 77.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pillartech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 434.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (47%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pillar Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pillartech.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pillartech.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pillartech.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pillartech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pillartech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pillar Tech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: